Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Jun 17;116(3):16641.
doi: 10.23749/mdl.v116i3.16641.

Ergonomic Criteria and Usability Testing of Cut-Resistant Protective Gloves: An Experimental Study

Sahar Heydarnia  1 , Mahdi Jalali  2 , Saied Sabzehali  3 , Majid Zarrin  3 , Ehsanollah Habibi  4
Affiliations

Ergonomic Criteria and Usability Testing of Cut-Resistant Protective Gloves: An Experimental Study

Sahar Heydarnia et al. Med Lav. .

Abstract

Background: Although hand and arm injuries can be prevented with protective gloves, their use may reduce hand dexterity and muscle strength. This study examined the ergonomic criteria and usability of four cut-resistant protective gloves (CRPGs) types to identify the optimal glove choice.

Methods: In this experimental study, 22 male participants were tested under five conditions: barehanded, wearing nitrile-coated gloves, gel-coated gloves, material-coated gloves, and foam nitrile-coated gloves. Dexterity was assessed using the Bennett and O'Connor tests; grip and pinch force were measured with a dynamometer, and a goniometer assessed the range of motion. The gloves' usability was evaluated through the System Usability Scale (SUS) questionnaire. At the same time, localized discomfort in different areas of the hand was assessed using the Local Perceived Discomfort (LPD) questionnaire. Finally, glove comparisons were made using appropriate statistical tests analyzed with SPSS version 24 software.

Results: All examined CRPGs significantly lowered finger dexterity scores (p < 0.001). However, the effects of different gloves on hand dexterity varied. Wearing all four gloves reduced grip force, but statistically significant differences in grip force were noted only between the barehanded condition and Glove B (p = 0.004). Using all four gloves increased pinch force, though this increase was statistically significant only between the barehanded condition and Glove D (p = 0.005). Wearing all gloves caused a statistically significant reduction in wrist, palm, and finger range of motion compared to the barehanded condition (p < 0.005). Lastly, there was a significant statistical difference between the gloves regarding usability (p = 0.001) and LPD (p = 0.001).

Conclusions: CRPGs can greatly influence hand skills. Glove D, featuring a foam nitrile coating, exhibited the highest finger dexterity compared to the other gloves studied. Considering aspects like sweat resistance and anatomical design, this foam nitrile-coated glove is appropriate for cutting-resistant tasks within various industries.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Local perceived Discomfort (LPD) scale.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

References

    1. Hertz RP, Emmett EA. Risk Factors for Occupational Hand Injury. J Occup Environ Med. 1986;28(1):36–41. - PubMed
    1. Yarahmadi R, Jalali M. The risk assessment of related factors of hand activities in the automotive industry. Iran Occup Health. 2012;9(1)
    1. Khan H, Jamshaid H, Mishra R, Militky J, Sramek R. Development of cost effective cut resistant gloves by using virgin and recycled PPTA. Novelties in fibrous material science. :273.
    1. Abu-Taleb W, Rehan Youssef A. Work-related musculoskeletal disorders among Egyptian physical therapists. Bull Fac Phys Ther. 2021;26:1–11.
    1. Gyer G, Michael J, Inklebarger J. Occupational hand injuries: a current review of the prevalence and proposed prevention strategies for physical therapists and similar healthcare professionals. J Integr Med. 2018;16(2):84–9. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources