Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2025 Jul 5;122(15):420-426.
doi: 10.3238/arztebl.m2025.0099.

The Early Detection, Diagnostic Evaluation, and Local Treatment of Prostate Cancer: A Paradigm Shift

Affiliations
Review

The Early Detection, Diagnostic Evaluation, and Local Treatment of Prostate Cancer: A Paradigm Shift

Peter Albers et al. Dtsch Arztebl Int. .

Abstract

Background: Approximately 75 000 men receive a diagnosis of prostate cancer in Germany each year. New data on the early detection, diagnostic evaluation, and treatment of prostate cancer provide the basis for a paradigm shift in the management of locally confined prostate cancer.

Methods: This narrative review is based on the systematic literature search that was carried out for the 2025 update of the German clinical practice guideline on prostate cancer.

Results: Risk-adapted early detection is now recommended. This involves the measurement of a baseline PSA value at age 45 whose magnitude determines the interval of follow-up testing: once every 5 years for baseline values below 1.5 ng/mL, and once every two years for baseline values between 1.5 and 3 ng/mL. Patients with PSA levels above 3 ng/mL should undergo a repeat PSA test and, if these levels are confirmed, receive a urological risk assessment including prostatic volume, family history, and past medical history. High risk patients should undergo magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and, if necessary, prostate biopsy. This new PSA-MRI algorithm increases accuracy in detecting clinically significant prostate cancers, enabling the previously recommended annual testing and digital rectal examination to be avoided. Another novelty is that the indication for an active surveillance strategy for men with low-risk prostate cancer has been expanded to ISUP grade group 1 and 2 cancers with favorable risk.

Conclusion: The need for high-quality diagnostic testing, including MRI, with broad geographic coverage will be a major challenge to the health care system, especially with regard to accessibility. Patients can be expected to benefit greatly from the new PSA-MRI algorithm, as it eliminates unnecessary diagnostic testing and treatment while enabling necessary treatment to be initiated earlier and therefore with fewer side effects.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure
Figure
Algorithm for risk-adapted early detection ERSPC, European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer; MRI, magnetic resonance imaging; PSA, prostate-specific antigen
Figure 1
Figure 1
Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) The patient is a 73-year-old man with a confirmed elevated PSA level of 9.5 ng/mL. In the peripheral zone of the mid-prostate, right anterior to posterolateral, there is a suspect area of highly probable carcinoma (arrows) with a PI-RADS of 5. Subsequent targeted MRI-ultrasound fusion biopsy led to the diagnosis of prostate cancer with a Gleason score of 3+4 (60%/40%).
Figure 2
Figure 2
PSMA-PET/CT in a 55-year-old man with an initial diagnosis of prostate cancer (iPSA 25.8 ng/mL). 18F-PSMA positron emission tomography (PET) for primary staging. The images in the upper row include coronal sections from computed tomography (CT) scans, a PET scan, and a fused PET/CT scan. The images in the lower row include a transaxial CT and a fused PET/CT. The PSMA PET/CTs show focal, intensified PSMA uptake in the prostate, without uptake in the lymph nodes or other organs (miTNM codeline: mT3b [LM, RM, LSV] N0 M0).
eFigure
eFigure
Targeted MRI/ultrasound fusion biopsy system Computer used to combine MRI images with ultrasound images (left), high-resolution ultrasound scanner (middle), exam table with leg support (right, foreground)

References

    1. RKI; Krebsregisterdaten Zf, editors. Robert Koch Institut; 2022. Krebs in Deutschland.
    1. Worst TS, Surovtsova I, Vogel T, et al. [Incidence, therapy, and prognosis of prostate cancer in Baden-Württemberg: Analysis based on cancer registry data] Urologie. 2024;63:681–692. - PMC - PubMed
    1. James ND, Tannock I, N‘Dow J, et al. The Lancet Commission on prostate cancer: Planning for the surge in cases. Lancet. 2024;403:1683–1722. - PMC - PubMed
    1. de Vos II, Meertens A, Hogenhout R, Remmers S, Roobol MJ. ERSPC Rotterdam Study Group: A detailed evaluation of the effect of prostate-specific antigen-based screening on morbidity and mortality of prostate cancer: 21-year follow-up results of the Rotterdam section of the European Randomised Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer. Eur Urol. 2023;85:426–434. - PubMed
    1. Arsov C, Albers P, Herkommer K, et al. A randomized trial of risk-adapted screening for prostate cancer in young men—results of the first screening round of the PROBASE trial. Int J Cancer. 2022;150:1861–1869. - PubMed

Substances