Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2025 Jun 19;42(7):273.
doi: 10.1007/s12032-025-02822-1.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors in cancer therapy: what lies beyond monoclonal antibodies?

Affiliations
Review

Immune checkpoint inhibitors in cancer therapy: what lies beyond monoclonal antibodies?

Mohammad Reza Zamani et al. Med Oncol. .

Abstract

Immune checkpoints are critical in modulating immune responses and maintaining self-tolerance. Cancer cells can exploit these mechanisms to evade immune detection, making immune checkpoints attractive targets for cancer therapy. The introduction of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) has transformed cancer treatment, with monoclonal antibodies targeting CTLA-4, PD-1, and PD-L1 demonstrating clinical success. However, challenges such as immune-related adverse events, primary and acquired resistance, and high treatment costs persist. To address these challenges, it is essential to explore alternative strategies, including small-molecule and peptide-based inhibitors, aptamers, RNA-based therapies, gene-editing technologies, bispecific and multispecific agents, and cell-based therapies. Additionally, innovative approaches such as lysosome-targeting chimeras, proteolysis-targeting chimeras, and N-(2-hydroxypropyl) methacrylamide copolymers are emerging as promising options for enhancing treatment effectiveness. This review highlights significant advancements in the field, focusing on their clinical implications and successes.

Keywords: Cancer therapy; Immune checkpoint inhibitors; Immunotherapy; Monoclonal antibodies; Small molecules.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declarations. Conflict of interest: The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Alternatives to monoclonal antibodies for targeting inhibitory immune checkpoints in cancer immunotherapy (Created with bioRender.com)
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Emerging approaches for targeting and degrading membrane immune checkpoints (ICs). The mechanisms of action are not fully understood. Cation-independent mannose 6-phosphate receptor (CR-M6PR). (Created with bioRender.com)

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Pardoll DM. The blockade of immune checkpoints in cancer immunotherapy. Nat Rev Cancer. 2012;12(4):252–64. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ribas A, Wolchok JD. Cancer immunotherapy using checkpoint blockade. Science. 2018;359(6382):1350–5. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Farkona S, Diamandis EP, Blasutig IM. Cancer immunotherapy: the beginning of the end of cancer? BMC Med. 2016;14(1):73. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Schoenfeld AJ, Hellmann MD. Acquired resistance to immune checkpoint inhibitors. Cancer Cell. 2020;37(4):443–55. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Li S-J, Sun Z-J. Fueling immune checkpoint blockade with oncolytic viruses: current paradigms and challenges ahead. Cancer Lett. 2022;550: 215937. - PubMed

MeSH terms

Substances