Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Jun 19;35(1):258.
doi: 10.1007/s00590-025-04388-0.

Evaluating the incidence and associated factors of subscapularis failure following anatomical total shoulder arthroplasty: a systematic review

Affiliations

Evaluating the incidence and associated factors of subscapularis failure following anatomical total shoulder arthroplasty: a systematic review

Jonathan I Berg et al. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. .

Abstract

Introduction: Subscapularis dysfunction remains a devastating postoperative complication that negatively affects surgical outcomes following anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty (aTSA). This systematic review aims to determine the incidence of subscapularis failure following aTSA and evaluate the effectiveness of various surgical techniques and repair strategies.

Methods: We conducted a comprehensive literature search following PRISMA guidelines across PubMed, Cochrane, and Embase databases up to August 21, 2023. Included studies explicitly described aTSA and related complications, excluding those that did not differentiate aTSA outcomes from other procedures or were reviews, case reports, or cadaveric studies. We extracted data on demographics, surgical approaches, subscapularis management techniques, repair strategies, and the subscapularis failure rates.

Results: This review included 56 studies published between 2010 and 2023, covering 6173 patients. The overall subscapularis failure rate was 3.7%, with variability based on surgical approach and follow-up duration. Lesser tuberosity osteotomy (LTO) demonstrated the lowest failure rate at 1.7%. Subscapularis tenotomy had a failure rate of 3.3%. Studies with follow-up periods longer than five years reported a combined 6.2% failure rate for all approaches. Subscapularis repair techniques had comparable rates of failure as tendon-tendon repair showed 2.7% failure and transosseous repair showed 3.0% failure. We further stratified transosseous repair by subscapularis approach and found similar failure rates for LTO and tenotomy techniques had similar rates of failure, at 1.7% and 3.2%, respectively.

Conclusions: This systematic review highlights the variability in subscapularis failure rates following aTSA and underscores the influence of surgical technique and follow-up duration on these outcomes. Based on this review, LTO appears to offer slightly lower failure rates compared to tenotomy or peel techniques. Following tenotomy, transosseous repair showed higher failure rates compared to tendon-tendon suture repair. There is a need for further standardization in defining and reporting subscapularis failure, along with extended follow-up studies and more level I randomized trials to compare between technique types.

Keywords: Anatomical Total Shoulder Arthroplasty; Subscapularis Failure; Complications; Rotator Cuff.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declarations. Conflict of interest: AZK would like to disclose research support from Stryker and DePuy. Paid presenter or speaker from Enovis. JAA would like to disclose: Royalties from a company or supplier; Disclosures; OSTEOCENTRIC TECHNOLOGIES, ENOVIS, ZIMMER-BIOMET, STRYKER, GLOBUS MEDICAL, INC. Stocks in: SHOULDER JAM, AEVUMED, OBERD, OTS MEDICAL, ORTHOBULLETS, ATREON, RESTORE 3D. Research support from a company or supplier as a PI; Disclosures; ENOVIS, ARTHREX. Royalties, financial or material support from publishers; Disclosures; WOLTERS KLUWER, SLACK ORTHOPAEDICS, ELSEVIER. Board member/committee appointments for a society; Disclosures; AMERICAN SHOULDER AND ELBOW SOCIETY, MID ATLANTIC SHOULDER AND ELBOW SOCIETY, SHOULDER 360, PACIRA.

Similar articles

References

    1. Best MJ, Aziz KT, Wilckens JH, McFarland EG, Srikumaran U (2021) Increasing incidence of primary reverse and anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty in the United States. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 30(5):1159–1166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2020.08.010 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Marigi EM, Elahi MA, Cancio-Bello AM, Duquin TR, Sperling JW (2022) Stemless anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty: surgical technique and review of the literature. JSES Rev Rep Tech 2(4):442–450. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.xrrt.2022.08.001 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
    1. Matache BA, Lapner P (2017) Anatomic shoulder arthroplasty: technical considerations. TOORTHJ 11(1):1115–1125. https://doi.org/10.2174/1874325001711011115 - DOI
    1. Dillon MT, Beleckas CM, Navarro RA (2023) Techniques for managing the subscapularis and addressing failures of the tendon in anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty. Orthopedics. https://doi.org/10.3928/01477447-20230517-01 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Levy D, Abrams G, Harris J, Bach B, Nicholson G, Romeo A (2016) Rotator cuff tears after total shoulder arthroplasty in primary osteoarthritis: a systematic review. Int J Shoulder Surg 10(2):78. https://doi.org/10.4103/0973-6042.180720 - DOI - PubMed - PMC

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources