Development of a practice-based score to predict extended duration of proton beam therapy session in pediatric patients
- PMID: 40537726
- PMCID: PMC12630184
- DOI: 10.1007/s12094-025-03972-4
Development of a practice-based score to predict extended duration of proton beam therapy session in pediatric patients
Abstract
Purpose: Due to the labor intensity demanded by proton beam therapy (PBT) in pediatric patients, information on operational procedures related to efficiency is crucial to optimize quality and safety. We aimed to identify patient factors that affect the duration of the pediatric PBT session and to develop an easy-to-use predictive score of extended duration.
Methods/patients: This is an observational retrospective cohort study in an academic medical centre, between May 2020 and February 2024. Seventy seven ASA III pediatric patients treated with PBT were recruited.
Results: The mean age was 4.8 years [standard deviation (SD): 2.1] and 52% were women. The mean duration of the PBT session was 50 min (SD: 17). Extended duration of the PBT session (> 45 min) occurred in 39 patients (51%). Five predictors of extended duration were selected for the final prediction model. In the multivariable model, an age > 45 months showed a near eightfold increased odds of extended duration [Odds ratio (OR): 7.76, 95% confidence interval (95% CI) 1.63-36.99, P = 0.010]. The OR (95% CI) for long-term venous access, no recurrent tumors, hydrocephalus, and craniospinal location were 5.91 (1.47 to 23.79), 3.81 (0.67 to 21.69), 3.79 (0.90 to 15.97), and 2.59 (0.69 to 9.76), respectively. This five-variable model was used to build a nomogram-based score with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.84 (95% CI 0.76-0.93).
Conclusions: A simple nomogram based on readily available pretreatment data has potential for planning pediatric PBT standard clinical expert practice.
Keywords: Pediatric cancer; Proton beam therapy; Treatment planning.
© 2025. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
Declarations. Conflict of interest: The authors have no competing interests to declare that are relevant to the content of this article. Ethical approval and informed consent: The study was approved by the Research Ethics Committee of the University of Navarra (Date: June 13, 2024. Project number: 2024.11) and adhered to the Revised Declaration of Helsinki [13]. The need to obtain informed written consent from patients was waived due to the retrospective nature of the study.
Figures
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
