Tearing down inequalities in the healthcare system across Europe: the BEACON project
- PMID: 40538689
- PMCID: PMC12176732
- DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1520772
Tearing down inequalities in the healthcare system across Europe: the BEACON project
Abstract
Equity in healthcare remains a pressing issue in cancer care across the European Union. Although numerous European initiatives address prevention, early diagnosis, and treatment, significant disparities in access to innovative cancer therapies persist. Time-to-reimbursement for new anticancer drugs varies widely between member states, depending on national health policies, economic capacity, and healthcare infrastructure. These differences particularly affect countries in Central and Eastern Europe, where delays in reimbursement, limited access to clinical trials, and restricted availability of specialized care contribute to worse outcomes. This narrative review examines how disparities in reimbursement timelines and access to new cancer therapies may affect factors such as early detection, specialized treatment availability, clinical trial participation, and socioeconomic status. The discussion is framed within the BEACON project, a European Union-funded initiative under the EU4Health programme. BEACON brings together patients, healthcare providers, researchers, and policymakers to create a cross-border network for quality-assured diagnosis and treatment. Through its multilingual digital platform, the project fosters collaboration, supports health literacy, and enhances access to innovative cancer therapies, aiming to reduce inequities regardless of geographic or socioeconomic background.
Keywords: Europe; cancer; health disparities; new therapies; new treatment; socioeconomic status; survival; time to reimbursement.
Copyright © 2025 Koukoutzeli, Ferraris, Coppini, Ferrari, Fragale, Trapani, Minchella, Grasso, Curigliano and Pravettoni.
Conflict of interest statement
GC received honoraria for speaker’s engagement: Roche, Seagen, Astra Zeneca, Daichii Sankyo, Novartis, Lilly, Pfizer, Roche, BMS, MSD; Menarini, Gilead. Honoraria for providing consultancy: Roche, Seagen, Novartis, Lilly, Pfizer, Menarini, Astra Zeneca, Daichii Sankyo, Gilead; Honoraria for participating in Advisory Board: Seagen, Novartis, Lilly, Pfizer, Menarini, Astra Zeneca, Daichii Sankyo, Gilead; Ellipsis; Institutional research funding for conducting phase I and II clinical trials: Pfizer, Roche, Novartis, Sanofi, Celgene, Servier, Orion, AstraZeneca, Seattle Genetics, AbbVie, Tesaro, BMS, Merck Sero-no, Merck Sharp Dome, Janssen-Cilag, Philogen, Bayer, Medivation, Medimmune. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Figures
References
-
- Aristotle L. Nichomachean ethics. Trans. Ostwald M. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall (1999)
-
- Ward A. Justice as Economics in Aristotle’s Nicomachean Ethics. Can Polit Sci Rev. (2010) 4:1–11.
-
- ECPC . Improving cancer care through broader access to quality biomarker testing policy recommendations unlocking the potential of precision medicine in Europe. (2021).
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
