Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2025 Jun 5:12:1588847.
doi: 10.3389/fvets.2025.1588847. eCollection 2025.

Diagnostic imaging in the pregnant bitch: risks, advantages, and disadvantages

Affiliations
Review

Diagnostic imaging in the pregnant bitch: risks, advantages, and disadvantages

Magdalena Schrank et al. Front Vet Sci. .

Abstract

Diagnostic imaging techniques are routinely used in bitches during pregnancy. Ultrasound examination (UE) and radiographic imaging (RI) are the two most frequently employed exams, for pregnancy diagnosis, assessment of fetal vitality and parturition date prediction, and for determination of litter size, respectively. In human medicine, the effects of radiation exposure resulting from diagnostic imaging, as well as radiation thresholds above which the risk of permanent damage to the offspring is significant, are well documented. Although no such information is available in veterinary medicine, breeders are increasingly skeptical about the use of X-rays in bitches in late-stage pregnancy, both because of the potential harm caused by the stress of the exam and because of the direct effects of radiation on the dam and fetuses. Stress is known to exert an effect in the reproductive processes in many species with one of the greatest stressors being the separation of the bitch from the pups for transport to the veterinary clinic during or right after parturition. This review also demonstrates that the harm resulting from radiation exposure from a radiographic study in a bitch during late-stage pregnancy and for its fetuses, who have already completed organogenesis, is poorly researched. While breeders' hesitations may be perceived as unfounded by the veterinarians, it is crucial that they are taken into consideration and that clear communication between the breeder and veterinarian is established. Owners should be informed of the lack of studies on the subject in the domestic dog but also presented the available information for other species including the human.

Keywords: X-ray; diagnostic imaging; dog; pregnancy; radiation; stress; ultrasound.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Similar articles

References

    1. Streffer C, Shore R, Konermann G, Meadows A, Uma Devi P, Preston Withers J, et al. Biological effects after prenatal irradiation (embryo and fetus). A report of the international commission on radiological protection. Ann ICRP. (2003) 33:5–206. doi: 10.1016/S0146-6453(03)00021-6, PMID: - DOI - PubMed
    1. Williams PM, Fletcher S. Health effects of prenatal radiation exposure. Am Fam Physician. (2010) 82:488–93. PMID: - PubMed
    1. Fattibene P, Mazzei F, Nuccetelli C, Risica S. Prenatal exposure to ionizing radiation: sources, effects and regulatory aspects. Acta Paediatr. (1999) 88:693–702. doi: 10.1111/j.1651-2227.1999.tb00024.x, PMID: - DOI - PubMed
    1. Fletcher S, Williams P. Health effects of prenatal radiation exposure. Am Fam Physician. (2010) 82:488–93. - PubMed
    1. Valentin J. International commission on radiological protection. The 2007 recommendations of the international commission on radiological protection. Ann ICRP ICRP Publ. (2007) 103:2–4. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources