Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 May 30;59(6):9-22.
doi: 10.47895/amp.v59i6.11554. eCollection 2025.

A Scoping Review on the Status of Clinical Simulation in Healthcare Education in the Philippines

Affiliations

A Scoping Review on the Status of Clinical Simulation in Healthcare Education in the Philippines

Christopher S Constantino et al. Acta Med Philipp. .

Abstract

Background: Simulation immerses learners in guided replications of real-life experiences. Simulation-based learning in the health profession allows trainees and professionals to practice skills in a controlled environment using various modalities, enhancing patient safety and minimizing clinical errors.

Objective: To describe the profile of Philippine studies on clinical simulation in healthcare professional education and assess the methodological quality of these studies.

Methods: We conducted a scoping review of studies on clinical simulation studies in healthcare education in the Philippines. We followed the methods for scoping review and reported using the PRISMA Scoping review checklist. We searched for relevant studies from electronic databases (PubMed, Scopus, CENTRAL, Herdin, and Cochrane) as of May 17, 2024, and summarized descriptive data on the characteristics of the study, population, clinical simulation technique, and outcomes, using graphical summaries and tables. We assessed the methodological quality of included studies using the Modified Medical Education Research Study Quality Instrument (MMERSQI).

Results: We included 13 studies mostly published in the 2020s (7), by faculty as main author (9), with hospital affiliation (10), single-center (11), setting in NCR (11), analytic (10), medical field (10), educational purpose (7), using task trainers (5), low- to medium-fidelity (11), with technical competencies (mostly skills) as desired outcome (9), median sample size of 40, and including mostly postgraduate level participants (7). There was moderate methodological quality (median MMERSQI score, 51 [range, 40, 77] with the 'type of data' item being highly reported and 'validity of instrument tool' item poorly reported.

Conclusion: The observed gaps in methodological rigor, study design, and fidelity of simulation techniques in healthcare education in the Philippines highlight opportunities for advancing the field. Future research should aim to address these gaps, particularly by increasing the use of RCTs, enhancing the validity of measurement tools, and incorporating comprehensive simulation components.

Keywords: Philippines; clinical simulation; healthcare education; scoping review; simulation training; simulation-based education.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

All authors declared no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
PRISMA flow chart.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Distribution of studies by type of main author.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Distribution of studies by type of specialty of main author.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Geographic distribution of Metro Manila-based studies. Green pin (k = 6) (Carrillo 2017; Chan 2018; Grullo 2017; Lim-Navarro 2024; Loyola 2020; Sotto 2009) Yellow pin (k = 2) (Berdida 2023; Sotto 1994) Orange pin (k =1) (Gardner 2022) Note: Not in map: 6 hospitals in Metro Manila (Santana 1992); Dasmarinas, Cavite (Escueta 2023); Mati, Davao Oriental (McCaw 2023); Not stated (Menna 2024)

Similar articles

References

    1. Lioce L. (Ed.), Lopreiato J. (Founding Ed.), Downing D., Chang T.P., Robertson J.M., Anderson M., Diaz D.A., and Spain A.E. (Assoc. Eds.) and the Terminology and Concepts Working Group (2020), Healthcare Simulation Dictionary –Second Edition. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; September 2020. AHRQ Publication No. 20-0019. doi: 10.23970/simulationv2. Available from https://www.umassmed.edu/globalassets/icels/4-courses-for-icels-educator... - DOI
    1. Gaba DM. The future vision of simulation in health care. Qual Saf Health Care. 2004. Oct;13 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):i2-10. doi: 10.1136/qhc.13.suppl_1.i2. PMID: 15465951; PMCID: . - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. INACSL Standards Committee . INACSL standards of best practice: SimulationSM. Simulation glossary. Clinical Simulation in Nursing. 2016;12(S):S39-S47. doi: 10.1016/j.ecns.2016.09.012 - DOI
    1. Aebersold M. The history of simulation and its impact on the future. AACN Adv Crit Care. 2016. Feb;27(1):56–61. PMID: 26909454. doi: 10.4037/aacnacc2016436 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lateef F. Simulation-based learning: Just like the real thing. J Emerg Trauma Shock. 2010;3(4):348-352. doi: 10.4103/0974-2700.70743. PMID: 21063557; PMCID: . - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources