Clinical Implication of Quantitative Flow Ratio to Predict Clinical Outcomes in De Novo Coronary Lesions After Drug-Coated Balloon Angioplasty
- PMID: 40540079
- DOI: 10.1007/s10557-025-07735-9
Clinical Implication of Quantitative Flow Ratio to Predict Clinical Outcomes in De Novo Coronary Lesions After Drug-Coated Balloon Angioplasty
Abstract
Purpose: The association between the intra-procedure quantitative flow ratio (QFR) and clinical outcomes after drug-coated balloon (DCB) angioplasty has not been investigated. This study aimed to investigate the clinical predictive value of pre-DCB QFR, a functional assessment of lesion preparation, for clinical outcomes in de novo coronary lesions after DCB angioplasty.
Methods: This retrospective study included 170 consecutive patients undergoing DCB angioplasty for 177 de novo coronary lesions between January 2021 and December 2022. The QFR was computed at baseline, pre-DCB, and post-DCB. The primary endpoint was major adverse cardiac events (MACE), defined as a composite of all-cause death, cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction, and target lesion revascularization.
Results: During 2-year follow-up, 37 patients with 38 lesions have experienced MACE. The pre-DCB QFR, measured after pre-dilation, was significantly lower in the MACE group. Receiver operator characteristic curve analysis showed the optimal pre-DCB QFR cut-off value for predicting MACE was 0.925 (area under curve = 0.782, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.702-0.861, sensitivity = 78.9%, specificity = 74.8%, p < 0.001). A pre-DCB QFR < 0.925 was associated with a significantly higher risk of MACE compared with a value > 0.925 (46.1% vs. 7.1%, p < 0.001). In multivariable Cox regression analyses, pre-DCB QFR < 0.925 was associated with an over sixfold increased risk of MACE (hazard ratio = 7.483, 95% CI 3.363-16.653, p < 0.001).
Conclusion: The pre-DCB QFR was a promising predictor of unfavorable clinical outcomes in de novo coronary lesions after DCB angioplasty.
Keywords: De novo coronary lesion; Drug-coated balloon; Major adverse cardiac events; Quantitative flow ratio.
© 2025. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.
Conflict of interest statement
Declarations. Ethics Approval: This study complied with the Declaration of Helsinki and was approved by Taizhou Central Hospital Review Board. Consent to Participate: Written informed consent was obtained from all patients before cardiac catheterization. Consent for Publication: All authors read and approved the final version of manuscript for publication. Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests.
Similar articles
-
Predictors for quantitative flow ratio loss in patients with de novo coronary artery disease treated with drug-coated balloons.Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 1;15(1):21479. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-05578-w. Sci Rep. 2025. PMID: 40594463 Free PMC article.
-
The Predictive Value of Quantitative Flow Ratio and Its Derived Angiographic Microvascular Resistance for Restenosis Following Drug-Coated Balloon Angioplasty.Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2025 Jul 23. doi: 10.1002/ccd.70028. Online ahead of print. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2025. PMID: 40697160
-
Predictors and Long-Term Prognostic Significance of Bailout Stenting During Percutaneous Coronary Interventions With Sirolimus-Coated Balloon: A Subanalysis of the Eastbourne Study.Am J Cardiol. 2025 Mar 15;239:68-74. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2024.12.015. Epub 2024 Dec 16. Am J Cardiol. 2025. PMID: 39694084
-
Vessel Preparation in Infrapopliteal Arterial Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.J Endovasc Ther. 2024 Apr;31(2):191-202. doi: 10.1177/15266028221120752. Epub 2022 Sep 4. J Endovasc Ther. 2024. PMID: 36062761 Free PMC article.
-
Network meta-analysis of drug-coated balloon angioplasty versus primary nitinol stenting for femoropopliteal atherosclerotic disease.J Vasc Surg. 2021 May;73(5):1802-1810.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2020.10.075. Epub 2020 Nov 26. J Vasc Surg. 2021. PMID: 33249205 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Nakazawa G, Otsuka F, Nakano M, Vorpahl M, Yazdani SK, Ladich E, Kolodgie FD, Finn AV, Virmani R. The pathology of neoatherosclerosis in human coronary implants bare-metal and drug-eluting stents. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011;57:1314–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2011.01.011 . - DOI - PubMed - PMC
-
- Hassan AK, Bergheanu SC, Stijnen T, van der Hoeven BL, Snoep JD, Plevier JW, Schalij MJ, Wouter JJ. Late stent malapposition risk is higher after drug-eluting stent compared with bare-metal stent implantation and associates with late stent thrombosis. Eur Heart J. 2010;31:1172–80. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehn553 . - DOI - PubMed
-
- Jeger RV, Eccleshall S, Wan Ahmad WA, Ge J, Poerner TC, Shin ES, Alfonso F, Latib A, Ong PJ, Rissanen TT, et al. Drug-coated balloons for coronary artery disease: Third Report of the International DCB Consensus Group. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2020;13:1391–402. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcin.2020.02.043 . - DOI - PubMed
-
- Vrints C, Andreotti F, Koskinas KC, Rossello X, Adamo M, Ainslie J, Banning AP, Budaj A, Buechel RR, Chiariello GA, et al. 2024 ESC Guidelines for the management of chronic coronary syndromes. Eur Heart J. 2024;45:3415–537. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehae177 . - DOI - PubMed
-
- Ma Z, Liu K, Hu Y, Hu X, Wang B, Li Z. Comparison between drug-coated balloon and stents in large de novo coronary artery disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis of RCT data. Cardiovasc Drugs Ther. 2024. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10557-024-07548-2 . - DOI - PubMed - PMC
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources