Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Jun 20.
doi: 10.1007/s11096-025-01954-8. Online ahead of print.

Research priorities of the European Society of Clinical Pharmacy (ESCP): a questionnaire-based study

Affiliations

Research priorities of the European Society of Clinical Pharmacy (ESCP): a questionnaire-based study

Betul Okuyan et al. Int J Clin Pharm. .

Abstract

Introduction: It is important for health professional societies to involve members in defining their roles and future activities including research priorities.

Aim: This study aimed to identify members' views on the areas of research that European Society of Clinical Pharmacy (ESCP) should prioritise in delivering research support, research projects and education.

Method: An online questionnaire was initially developed by the ESCP Research Committee and reviewed by the research team. It included structured and open-ended items related to respondents' demographics, research experience, views on future research priorities, topics that ESCP should prioritise, and barriers to research involvement. After testing face and content validity, the questionnaire was sent to all ESCP members (N = 417). Descriptive statistics and summative content analysis were used.

Results: Eighty-two responses were received (response rate: 19.7%). Research on real-world processes that facilitate the implementation of clinical pharmacy services into every-day practice was the priority for most respondents (n = 77, 93.9%). Respondents believed that ESCP should focus on research support for implementation science (n = 52, 63.4%) and methods to analyse clinical judgement and decision-making (n = 48, 58.5%). The perceived barriers to developing high-quality research in clinical pharmacy were reported as a lack of knowledge, skills and training, limited funding opportunities and insufficient time.

Conclusion: Research topics identified will help to inform ESCP and its committees on the priorities for research activities of the society in the near future, as well as other collaborating professional organisations of the current priority research objectives of ESCP in the international context.

Keywords: Barriers; Clinical pharmacist; European Society of Clinical Pharmacy; Research priorities.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declarations. Competing interests: Derek Stewart is the Editor-in-Chief; Vibhu Paudyal and Anita Weidmann are the Associate Editors of International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy respectively. They had no role in handling the manuscript, specifically the processes of editorial review, peer review and decision making. Ethics approval: The study was reviewed and approved by the ESCP General Committee and the University of Birmingham (UK) Research Ethics Committee (approval reference number RN_1098-Jun2023). Consent to participate: Electronic consent forms were obtained.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Dreischulte T, van den Bemt B, Steurbaut S, et al. European Society of Clinical Pharmacy definition of the term clinical pharmacy and its relationship to pharmaceutical care: a position paper. Int J Clin Pharm. 2022;44(4):837–42. - DOI - PubMed - PMC
    1. Paudyal V, Fialová D, Henman MC, et al. Pharmacists’ involvement in COVID-19 vaccination across Europe: a situational analysis of current practice and policy. Int J Clin Pharm. 2021;43(4):1139–48. - DOI - PubMed - PMC
    1. Paudyal V, Cadogan C, Fialová D, et al. Provision of clinical pharmacy services during the COVID-19 pandemic: experiences of pharmacists from 16 European countries. Res Social Adm Pharm. 2021;17(8):1507–17. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Patterson SM, Cadogan C, Barry HE, et al. Cross-sectional questionnaire study of the experiences of community pharmacists in Northern Ireland during the early phases of the COVID-19 pandemic: preparation, experience and response. BMJ Open. 2022;12(9):e064545. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Jebara T, Cunningham S, MacLure K, et al. Stakeholders’ views and experiences of pharmacist prescribing: a systematic review. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2018;84(9):1883–905. - DOI - PubMed - PMC

LinkOut - more resources