Research priorities of the European Society of Clinical Pharmacy (ESCP): a questionnaire-based study
- PMID: 40540123
- DOI: 10.1007/s11096-025-01954-8
Research priorities of the European Society of Clinical Pharmacy (ESCP): a questionnaire-based study
Abstract
Introduction: It is important for health professional societies to involve members in defining their roles and future activities including research priorities.
Aim: This study aimed to identify members' views on the areas of research that European Society of Clinical Pharmacy (ESCP) should prioritise in delivering research support, research projects and education.
Method: An online questionnaire was initially developed by the ESCP Research Committee and reviewed by the research team. It included structured and open-ended items related to respondents' demographics, research experience, views on future research priorities, topics that ESCP should prioritise, and barriers to research involvement. After testing face and content validity, the questionnaire was sent to all ESCP members (N = 417). Descriptive statistics and summative content analysis were used.
Results: Eighty-two responses were received (response rate: 19.7%). Research on real-world processes that facilitate the implementation of clinical pharmacy services into every-day practice was the priority for most respondents (n = 77, 93.9%). Respondents believed that ESCP should focus on research support for implementation science (n = 52, 63.4%) and methods to analyse clinical judgement and decision-making (n = 48, 58.5%). The perceived barriers to developing high-quality research in clinical pharmacy were reported as a lack of knowledge, skills and training, limited funding opportunities and insufficient time.
Conclusion: Research topics identified will help to inform ESCP and its committees on the priorities for research activities of the society in the near future, as well as other collaborating professional organisations of the current priority research objectives of ESCP in the international context.
Keywords: Barriers; Clinical pharmacist; European Society of Clinical Pharmacy; Research priorities.
© 2025. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
Declarations. Competing interests: Derek Stewart is the Editor-in-Chief; Vibhu Paudyal and Anita Weidmann are the Associate Editors of International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy respectively. They had no role in handling the manuscript, specifically the processes of editorial review, peer review and decision making. Ethics approval: The study was reviewed and approved by the ESCP General Committee and the University of Birmingham (UK) Research Ethics Committee (approval reference number RN_1098-Jun2023). Consent to participate: Electronic consent forms were obtained.
Similar articles
-
Home treatment for mental health problems: a systematic review.Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(15):1-139. doi: 10.3310/hta5150. Health Technol Assess. 2001. PMID: 11532236
-
The use of Open Dialogue in Trauma Informed Care services for mental health consumers and their family networks: A scoping review.J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2024 Aug;31(4):681-698. doi: 10.1111/jpm.13023. Epub 2024 Jan 17. J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2024. PMID: 38230967
-
A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of paclitaxel, docetaxel, gemcitabine and vinorelbine in non-small-cell lung cancer.Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(32):1-195. doi: 10.3310/hta5320. Health Technol Assess. 2001. PMID: 12065068
-
Rapid molecular tests for tuberculosis and tuberculosis drug resistance: a qualitative evidence synthesis of recipient and provider views.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Apr 26;4(4):CD014877. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014877.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022. PMID: 35470432 Free PMC article.
-
A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of topotecan for ovarian cancer.Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(28):1-110. doi: 10.3310/hta5280. Health Technol Assess. 2001. PMID: 11701100
Cited by
-
What's behind delirium: is there a specific role for medications?Eur Geriatr Med. 2025 Jul 10. doi: 10.1007/s41999-025-01269-x. Online ahead of print. Eur Geriatr Med. 2025. PMID: 40638064 Review.
References
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources