Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2025 Jun;83(6):1-8.
doi: 10.1055/s-0045-1809542. Epub 2025 Jun 20.

EMG versus US: a randomized clinical trial comparing the efficacy in guiding botulinum toxin treatment in cervical dystonia

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

EMG versus US: a randomized clinical trial comparing the efficacy in guiding botulinum toxin treatment in cervical dystonia

Mayara Thouin Graciani et al. Arq Neuropsiquiatr. 2025 Jun.

Abstract

Botulinum toxin type A (BoNT-A) is considered the first-line therapy for cervical dystonia.To compare, in a randomized trial, the efficacy of treatment with BoNT-A guided by ultrasound (US) and electromyography (EMG) in patients with idiopathic cervical dystonia.A total of 40 patients (20 in each group; mean age: 54 years; 45% of female subjects; mean disease duration: 10.7 years) were randomized to either US- or EMG-guided BoNT-A treatment. The efficacy of BoNT-A was assessed through changes in the scores on the Toronto Western Spasmodic Torticollis Rating Scale (TWSTRS) before and 4 to 6 weeks after the treatment. The differences in the absolute and relative changes in the total TWSTRS scores and in its components (severity, incapacity, and pain) between the groups were evaluated.The US and EMG groups were well balanced in relation to baseline and demographic characteristics. After the BoNT-A treatment, there was a mean reduction in the TWSTRS score of 8 points (relative reduction of 23%) equally between the US and EMG groups (mean difference in absolute decrease of 0.1 point; p = 0.97; and mean difference in relative decrease of 2%; p = 0.89). There were no differences in the declines in the scores on the TWSTRS components, nor when the improvements in the TWSTRS scores were dichotomized as more significant or lower reductions (all p-values > 0.3).The present randomized trial did not demonstrate any difference in improvements between BoNT-A treatment guided by US or EMG in patients with idiopathic cervical dystonia.ReBEC Identifier: RBR-33dd4p4.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have no conflict of interest to declare.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Abbreviations: BoNT-A, botulinum toxin type A; EMG, electromyography; TWSTRS, Toronto Western Spasmodic Torticollis Rating Scale; US, ultrasound. Study flowchart.

Similar articles

References

    1. Jankovic J, Leder S, Warner D, Schwartz K. Cervical dystonia: clinical findings and associated movement disorders. Neurology. 1991;41(07):1088–1091. doi: 10.1212/wnl.41.7.1088. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Jankovic J. Medical treatment of dystonia. Mov Disord. 2013;28(07):1001–1012. doi: 10.1002/mds.25552. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Rodrigues F B, Duarte G S, Marques R E, Castelão M, Ferreira J, Sampaio C et al. Botulinum toxin type A therapy for cervical dystonia. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020;11(11):CD003633. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003633.pub4. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Nijmeijer S W, Koelman J H, Kamphuis D J, Tijssen M A. Muscle selection for treatment of cervical dystonia with botulinum toxin–a systematic review. Parkinsonism Relat Disord. 2012;18(06):731–736. doi: 10.1016/j.parkreldis.2012.04.005. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Dressler D. Clinical applications of botulinum toxin. Curr Opin Microbiol. 2012;15(03):325–336. doi: 10.1016/j.mib.2012.05.012. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

Substances