Evaluation of 4D cone-beam CT reconstruction methods for lung images acquired using rapid cone-beam CT acquisition: a phantom study
- PMID: 40541251
- DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/ade6bd
Evaluation of 4D cone-beam CT reconstruction methods for lung images acquired using rapid cone-beam CT acquisition: a phantom study
Abstract
Objective. Cone-beam CT (CBCT) technological advances for linear accelerators (Linacs) have led to CBCT imaging in <20 s, which can reduce radiation therapy treatment times. However, these rapid CBCT scans only allow for 3DCBCT images. In this paper we evaluate 4DCBCT reconstruction methods for rapid acquisition 3DCBCT protocol scans using an anthropomorphic breathing phantom.Approach. We evaluate two previously developed motion-compensated Feldkamp-Davis-Kress (MCFDK) methods, using a prior-motion model (MCFDK-Prior) and a data-driven MCFDK method (MCFDK-DD), on CBCT images of the phantom using an Ethos linac. The deformable phantom lungs contained three synthetic tumours and a commercial phantom motion platform with a sinusoidal breathing pattern. The phantom was imaged in free-breathing with rapid (16.6 s) and standard (30.8 s) thorax 3DCBCT acquisition protocols, then reimaged while stationary at inhale and exhale, which were the ground truth reconstructions. MCFDK reconstructions were compared with conventional 3D-FDK and 4D-FDK reconstructions. Image quality was compared between all reconstructions using mean square error (MSE), structural similarity index measurement (SSIM), peak signal-to-noise (PSNR), edge response width (ERW) for the diaphragm-lung border for the right lung, tumour centroid accuracy, tumour dice similarity coefficient and sphericity.Main results. For all metrics the MCFDK-Prior reconstructions performed better than the 3D-FDK reconstructions. Similarly for all tumour-related metrics as well as ERW the MCFDK-DD reconstructions performed better than then 3D-FDK reconstructions, but the overall MSE, SSIM and PSNR were similar for the MCFDK-DD and 3D-FDK reconstructions. For all metrics except for tumour centroid error the MCFDK-Prior method produced better quality reconstructions than the MCFDK-DD method. 4D-FDK reconstructions produced poor quality volumes.Significance. We demonstrated that 4DCBCT reconstruction for rapid CBCT acquisition protocols is possible and leads to reduced motion artefacts and more accurate reconstructions when compared to 3DCBCT reconstructions. The 4DCBCT methods demonstrated in this paper will allow for fast, accurate 4DCBCT acquisition for new linacs.
Keywords: 4D cone-beam CT; motion compensated reconstruction; phantom.
Creative Commons Attribution license.
Similar articles
-
Data-driven rapid 4D cone-beam CT reconstruction for new generation linacs.Phys Med Biol. 2024 Sep 13;69(18). doi: 10.1088/1361-6560/ad780a. Phys Med Biol. 2024. PMID: 39241801
-
Hounsfield Unit characterization and dose calculation on a C-arm linac with novel on-board cone-beam computed tomography feature and advanced reconstruction algorithms.J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2025 Aug;26(8):e70145. doi: 10.1002/acm2.70145. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2025. PMID: 40714930 Free PMC article.
-
Clinical comparison of adaptive 4DCBCT scanning protocols for lung tumor motion assessment.J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2025 Jul;26(7):e70172. doi: 10.1002/acm2.70172. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2025. PMID: 40657701 Free PMC article.
-
A review on 4D cone-beam CT (4D-CBCT) in radiation therapy: Technical advances and clinical applications.Med Phys. 2024 Aug;51(8):5164-5180. doi: 10.1002/mp.17269. Epub 2024 Jun 23. Med Phys. 2024. PMID: 38922912 Free PMC article. Review.
-
A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of paclitaxel, docetaxel, gemcitabine and vinorelbine in non-small-cell lung cancer.Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(32):1-195. doi: 10.3310/hta5320. Health Technol Assess. 2001. PMID: 12065068
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources