Honest yet unacceptable research practices: when research becomes a health risk
- PMID: 40541433
- PMCID: PMC12182135
- DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-097757
Honest yet unacceptable research practices: when research becomes a health risk
Abstract
Background: Examples of poor research practices have received much attention in academic and public arenas. Such practices persist and threaten the health of the public and the reputation and impact of research and researchers.
Objective: In this article, we argue that research-though intended to improve health-can lead to patient harm through the proliferation of honest (though occasionally dishonest) yet unacceptable research practices.
Summary of key arguments: We argue that deliberate dishonest research practices-termed questionable research practices-are widely prevalent and insidious and influenced by both individual and cultural factors. Drawing on credible conceptualisations of poor research practices, we define honest yet unacceptable research practices to be different from questionable research practices involving dishonesty, but just as serious due to their wide prevalence and damaging impacts. Finally, we present recommendations for people and organisations to better protect patients' interests from honest yet unacceptable research practices.
Conclusion: Our recommendations can serve as the basis for preventing honest yet unacceptable poor research practices to safeguard public trust in health professions, researchers and practices.
Keywords: PUBLIC HEALTH; Quality Improvement; Quality in health care.
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2025. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ Group.
Conflict of interest statement
Competing interests: None declared.
Similar articles
-
Factors that influence parents' and informal caregivers' views and practices regarding routine childhood vaccination: a qualitative evidence synthesis.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Oct 27;10(10):CD013265. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013265.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021. PMID: 34706066 Free PMC article.
-
Responsible research impact: Ethics for making a difference.Open Res Eur. 2025 Mar 31;5:92. doi: 10.12688/openreseurope.19649.1. eCollection 2025. Open Res Eur. 2025. PMID: 40547537 Free PMC article.
-
Signs and symptoms to determine if a patient presenting in primary care or hospital outpatient settings has COVID-19.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 May 20;5(5):CD013665. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013665.pub3. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022. PMID: 35593186 Free PMC article.
-
How lived experiences of illness trajectories, burdens of treatment, and social inequalities shape service user and caregiver participation in health and social care: a theory-informed qualitative evidence synthesis.Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 Jun;13(24):1-120. doi: 10.3310/HGTQ8159. Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025. PMID: 40548558
-
Comparison of cellulose, modified cellulose and synthetic membranes in the haemodialysis of patients with end-stage renal disease.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2001;(3):CD003234. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003234. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2001. Update in: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005 Jul 20;(3):CD003234. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003234.pub2. PMID: 11687058 Updated.
References
-
- Bausell BR. The problem with science. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2021.
-
- Hall J, Martin BR. Towards a taxonomy of research misconduct: The case of business school research. Res Policy. 2019;48:414–27. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2018.03.006. - DOI
-
- Christian K, Larkins J, Doran MR. The australian academic stemm workplace post-covid: a picture of disarray. Sci Commun Edu. 2022 doi: 10.1101/2022.12.06.519378. Preprint. - DOI
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials