Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2025 Jun 20;15(6):e097757.
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-097757.

Honest yet unacceptable research practices: when research becomes a health risk

Affiliations
Review

Honest yet unacceptable research practices: when research becomes a health risk

Alexander M Clark et al. BMJ Open. .

Abstract

Background: Examples of poor research practices have received much attention in academic and public arenas. Such practices persist and threaten the health of the public and the reputation and impact of research and researchers.

Objective: In this article, we argue that research-though intended to improve health-can lead to patient harm through the proliferation of honest (though occasionally dishonest) yet unacceptable research practices.

Summary of key arguments: We argue that deliberate dishonest research practices-termed questionable research practices-are widely prevalent and insidious and influenced by both individual and cultural factors. Drawing on credible conceptualisations of poor research practices, we define honest yet unacceptable research practices to be different from questionable research practices involving dishonesty, but just as serious due to their wide prevalence and damaging impacts. Finally, we present recommendations for people and organisations to better protect patients' interests from honest yet unacceptable research practices.

Conclusion: Our recommendations can serve as the basis for preventing honest yet unacceptable poor research practices to safeguard public trust in health professions, researchers and practices.

Keywords: PUBLIC HEALTH; Quality Improvement; Quality in health care.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

Similar articles

References

    1. Bausell BR. The problem with science. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2021.
    1. Manapat PD, Anderson SF, Edwards MC. A revised and expanded taxonomy for understanding heterogeneity in research and reporting practices. Psychol Methods. 2024;29:350–61. doi: 10.1037/met0000488. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hall J, Martin BR. Towards a taxonomy of research misconduct: The case of business school research. Res Policy. 2019;48:414–27. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2018.03.006. - DOI
    1. Xie Y, Wang K, Kong Y. Prevalence of Research Misconduct and Questionable Research Practices: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Sci Eng Ethics. 2021;27:41. doi: 10.1007/s11948-021-00314-9. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Christian K, Larkins J, Doran MR. The australian academic stemm workplace post-covid: a picture of disarray. Sci Commun Edu. 2022 doi: 10.1101/2022.12.06.519378. Preprint. - DOI

LinkOut - more resources