Sandwich parastomal hernia repair, a prospective observational study
- PMID: 40542271
- PMCID: PMC12181211
- DOI: 10.1007/s10029-025-03335-6
Sandwich parastomal hernia repair, a prospective observational study
Abstract
Purpose: The aim of the study is to evaluate the safety, feasibility and short and long term outcomes following the Sandwich repair for parastomal hernia.
Methods: A prospective single center study including all patients operated with Sandwich repair at St. Olav hospital, Trondheim University hospital from 2018 to 2023.
Results: Fifty four patients were treated with the Sandwich repair. All procedures were performed laparoscopically, with two conversions to open surgery due to adhesions. The median age was 67 years. 44% of the patients were females. Two thirds of the patients had a colostomy. Pain or discomfort was the most frequent indication for parastomal hernia repair, followed by leakage. Median operation time was 149 min. Eight patients were operated in an emergency setting. Six patients had a recurrence after previous surgery for parastomal hernia. Three patients had ClavienDindo complication rate 3b following the Sandwich repair and had their implants removed a few days after index surgery. The median in-hospital time was 5 (2-35) days and the median followup was 33 months (1-61). No recurrences were identified.
Conclusion: The laparoscopic Sandwich repair is a safe methode for most of the parastomal hernia patients. Even with a reasonable long median follow-up, we did not observe any recurrences.
Keywords: Hernia; Ostomy; Parastomal hernia; Recurrence; Treatment.
© 2025. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
Declarations. Competing interests: The authors have no competing interests.
Similar articles
-
Current state of laparoscopic parastomal hernia repair: A meta-analysis.World J Gastroenterol. 2015 Jul 28;21(28):8670-7. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i28.8670. World J Gastroenterol. 2015. PMID: 26229409 Free PMC article.
-
End-colostomy parastomal hernia repair: a systematic review on laparoscopic and robotic approaches.Hernia. 2024 Jun;28(3):723-743. doi: 10.1007/s10029-024-03026-8. Epub 2024 Apr 16. Hernia. 2024. PMID: 38625435 Free PMC article.
-
Prosthetic mesh placement for the prevention of parastomal herniation.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jul 20;7(7):CD008905. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008905.pub3. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018. PMID: 30027652 Free PMC article.
-
Comparison of different mesh placement techniques for parastomal hernia repair: an updated systematic review and network meta-analysis.Hernia. 2025 Apr 12;29(1):140. doi: 10.1007/s10029-025-03330-x. Hernia. 2025. PMID: 40216651
-
Ten-year outcomes following ventral hernia repair: making the case for better post-market surveillance in the USA.Surg Endosc. 2023 Jul;37(7):5612-5622. doi: 10.1007/s00464-022-09725-6. Epub 2022 Nov 8. Surg Endosc. 2023. PMID: 36348168 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Israelsson LA (2008) Parastomal hernias. Surg Clin North Am 88(1):113–125 - PubMed
-
- Antoniou SA et al (2018) European hernia society guidelines on prevention and treatment of parastomal hernias. Hernia 22(1):183–198 - PubMed
-
- Etherington RJ et al (1990) Demonstration of para-ileostomy herniation using computed tomography. Clin Radiol 41(5):333–336 - PubMed
-
- Rubin MS, Schoetz DJ Jr, Matthews JB (1994) Parastomal hernia. Is stoma relocation superior to fascial repair? Arch Surg 129(4):413–418 - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources