Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2025 Jul;10(7):1570-1580.
doi: 10.1038/s41564-025-02035-2. Epub 2025 Jun 20.

Guidelines for preventing and reporting contamination in low-biomass microbiome studies

Affiliations
Review

Guidelines for preventing and reporting contamination in low-biomass microbiome studies

Noah Fierer et al. Nat Microbiol. 2025 Jul.

Abstract

Numerous important environments harbour low levels of microbial biomass, including certain human tissues, the atmosphere, plant seeds, treated drinking water, hyper-arid soils and the deep subsurface, with some environments lacking resident microbes altogether. These low microbial biomass environments pose unique challenges for standard DNA-based sequencing approaches, as the inevitability of contamination from external sources becomes a critical concern when working near the limits of detection. Likewise, lower-biomass samples can be disproportionately impacted by cross-contamination and practices suitable for handling higher-biomass samples may produce misleading results when applied to lower microbial biomass samples. This Consensus Statement outlines strategies to reduce contamination and cross-contamination, focusing on marker gene and metagenomic analyses. We also provide minimal standards for reporting contamination information and removal workflows. Considerations must be made at every study stage, from sample collection and handling through data analysis and reporting to reduce and identify contaminants. We urge researchers to adopt these recommendations when designing, implementing and reporting microbiome studies, especially those conducted in low-biomass systems.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests.

References

    1. Mallick, H. et al. Experimental design and quantitative analysis of microbial community multiomics. Genome Biol. 18, 228 (2017). - PubMed - PMC - DOI
    1. Widder, S. et al. Challenges in microbial ecology: building predictive understanding of community function and dynamics. ISME J. 10, 2557–2568 (2016). - PubMed - PMC - DOI
    1. Knight, R. et al. Best practices for analysing microbiomes. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 16, 410–422 (2018). - PubMed - DOI
    1. Mirzayi, C. et al. Reporting guidelines for human microbiome research: the STORMS checklist. Nat. Med. 27, 1885–1892 (2021). - PubMed - PMC - DOI
    1. Pollock, J., Glendinning, L., Wisedchanwet, T. & Watson, M. The madness of microbiome: attempting to find consensus ‘best practice’ for 16S microbiome studies. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 84, e02627-17 (2018). - PubMed - PMC - DOI

LinkOut - more resources