A comprehensive systematic review of prognostic factors, survival outcomes, and the role of targeted therapies in endometrial cancer

Abstract

Study background and objectives: Endometrial cancer, ranking as the 6th most prevalent cancer affecting women globally, is characterized by high mortality rates, recurrence, and poor prognosis. The disease lacks comprehensive understanding and effective treatment options. This meta-analysis focuses on randomized controlled trials to investigate targeted therapies, survival outcomes, and prognostic factors in endometrial cancer.

Methods: The study follows the PICOS protocol and PRISMA guidelines, utilizing Review Manager Software (Version 5.4) for meta-analyses. Predetermined outcomes relevant to the topic guide the study search, with the GRADE tool assessing the quality of evidence and Begg's formula and Kendall's Tau evaluating certainty.

Results: Results reveal oral anastrozole and vistusertib's efficacy, reducing progression-free survival (PFS) and enhancing protein detection. The meta-analysis indicates that targeted therapies do not significantly improve PFS but reduce adverse effects. Chemotherapy does not considerably improve survival rates, and interventions show no significant difference in prognostic factors.

Conclusion: In conclusion, anastrozole and vistusertib emerge as effective targeted therapies for endometrial cancer, supported by clinical trial evidence demonstrating reduced PFS and improved protein detection. Additionally, the carboplatin-paclitaxel combination and radiotherapy in monotherapy show promising clinical outcomes. These findings contribute to a comprehensive understanding of prognostic factors, targeted therapies, and survival outcomes in endometrial cancer, emphasizing the need for further research and clinical trials for optimal disease management.

Keywords: Clinical trials; Endometrial cancer; Meta-analysis; Survival rate; Targeted therapies.