Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2025 Aug;35(8):3221-3227.
doi: 10.1007/s11695-025-08013-1. Epub 2025 Jun 21.

Calibration Bougie Size Selection in Sleeve Gastrectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Nozim Jumaev  1 , Oktyabr Teshaev  2 , Irina Lim  3 , Gayrat Kurbanov  4
Affiliations
Review

Calibration Bougie Size Selection in Sleeve Gastrectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Nozim Jumaev et al. Obes Surg. 2025 Aug.

Abstract

Background: Sleeve gastrectomy has emerged as a leading bariatric procedure due to its effectiveness in inducing significant weight loss and improving obesity-related comorbidities. The calibration bougie size is a critical technical factor that influences outcomes, yet no universal consensus exists regarding optimal sizing.

Methods: A systematic review and network meta-analysis was conducted according to PRISMA guidelines. Electronic databases (PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science) were searched for studies examining bougie size in sleeve gastrectomy published between January 2000 and September 2024. Primary outcomes included weight loss efficacy, complication rates, and patient satisfaction.

Results: Thirty-five studies with 13,450 patients were included. Bougie sizes ranged from 32 to 50 Fr, with most surgeons utilizing 34-40 Fr. Network meta-analysis demonstrated that smaller bougie sizes (32-36 Fr) were associated with greater excess weight loss (pooled mean difference: 6.7%, 95% CI: 3.2-10.2, p < 0.001) but higher rates of strictures (OR: 2.14, 95% CI: 1.36-3.37, p = 0.001) and gastroesophageal reflux (OR: 1.76, 95% CI: 1.12-2.78, p = 0.015). Mid-range bougie sizes (36-40 Fr) showed intermediate results for both weight loss and complications. Patient-specific factors including baseline BMI, comorbidities, and anatomical variations significantly influenced outcomes, with bougie size having greater impact in patients with lower baseline BMI.

Conclusions: This network meta-analysis identifies that bougie size significantly impacts both weight loss and complication rates following sleeve gastrectomy. While mid-range bougie sizes (36-40 Fr) may balance weight loss efficacy and safety for many patients, bougie selection should be individualized based on patient characteristics, surgeon experience, and institutional protocols. Prospective studies are needed to establish evidence-based guidelines for personalized bougie size selection.

Keywords: Bariatric surgery; Bougie size; Calibration bougie; Meta-analysis; Sleeve gastrectomy; Systematic review.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declarations. Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests.

References

    1. English WJ, DeMaria EJ, Hutter MM, et al. American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery 2018 estimate of metabolic and bariatric procedures performed in the United States. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2020;16(4):457–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soard.2019.12.022 . - DOI
    1. Angrisani L, Santonicola A, Iovino P, et al. IFSO Worldwide Survey 2016: Primary, Endoluminal, and Revisional Procedures. Obes Surg. 2018;28(12):3783–94. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-018-3450-2 . - DOI
    1. Schauer PR, Bhatt DL, Kirwan JP, et al. Bariatric surgery versus intensive medical therapy for diabetes - 5-year outcomes. N Engl J Med. 2017;376(7):641–51. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1600869 . - DOI
    1. Adams TD, Davidson LE, Litwin SE, et al. Weight and metabolic outcomes 12 years after gastric bypass. N Engl J Med. 2017;377(12):1143–55. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1700459 . - DOI
    1. Rosenthal RJ, Diaz AA, Arvidsson D, et al. International Sleeve Gastrectomy Expert Panel Consensus Statement: best practice guidelines based on experience of >12,000 cases. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2012;8(1):8–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soard.2011.10.019 . - DOI

LinkOut - more resources