Trastuzumab Deruxtecan and Sacituzumab Govitecan for Hormone Receptor-Positive and Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-Low Metastatic Breast Cancer: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis
- PMID: 40544074
- DOI: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2025.05.017
Trastuzumab Deruxtecan and Sacituzumab Govitecan for Hormone Receptor-Positive and Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-Low Metastatic Breast Cancer: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis
Abstract
Objective: We aim to analyze the pharmacoeconomic characteristics of trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) and sacituzumab govitecan (SG) in the treatment of patients with hormone receptor-positive (HR+) and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-low (HER2-low) metastatic breast cancer who have previously undergone chemotherapy.
Methods: A cost-effectiveness study was conducted to compare these two treatment options with chemotherapy, respectively, in terms of their economic impact and clinical outcomes from the perspective of the United States payer. A partitioned survival model with a lifetime horizon comprising three distinct states was utilized for the simulation process of patients receiving trastuzumab deruxtecan or sacituzumab govitecan (in the T-DXd or SG group, respectively). The relevant health preference information and cost data were gathered from published articles.
Results: The T-DXd group, when compared to chemotherapy, provided an additional 0.34816 quality-adjusted life years (QALYs). This benefit was associated with an incremental cost of $222,149, resulting in an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of $638.066 per QALY. For the SG group, in comparison to chemotherapy, an extra 0.17469 QALYs were yielded. This gain was accompanied by an incremental cost of $221,830, leading to an ICER of $1,269,849 per QALY. The ICERs for both T-DXd and SG surpass the predetermined willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold of $150,000 per QALY. The univariate sensitivity analysis revealed that the costs of SG and T-DXd had a certain influence on the results, whereas other variables had minimal impact.
Conclusion: From the perspective of a U.S. payer, at a willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold of $150,000 per QALY, both T-DXd and SG were unlikely to be cost-effective compared to chemotherapy for HR+ and HER2-low metastatic breast cancer patients who have previously undergone chemotherapy. However, relative to SG, T-DXd achieved greater QALYs without a significant increase in cost.
Keywords: Breast cancer; Cost-effectiveness; Partitioned survival model; Sacituzumab govitecan; Trastuzumab deruxtecan.
Copyright © 2025 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that this research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as potential conflicts of interest.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous
