Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2025 Dec;57(1):2519685.
doi: 10.1080/07853890.2025.2519685. Epub 2025 Jun 22.

A validated predictive model for mid- and long-term mortality risk assessment after elective endovascular repair in abdominal aortic aneurysm patients

Ruihua Li  1 , Junshuai Xue  2 , Hongze Sun  1 , Jianjun Jiang  1 , Yang Liu  1
Affiliations
Free article
Meta-Analysis

A validated predictive model for mid- and long-term mortality risk assessment after elective endovascular repair in abdominal aortic aneurysm patients

Ruihua Li et al. Ann Med. 2025 Dec.
Free article

Abstract

Background: Risk scoring systems for open surgical repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) may overestimate mortality after endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR). A model for mid-term and long-term mortality after EVAR is still lacking.

Material and method: MEDLINE, Embase and WOS were searched from January 1, 2000 to December 31, 2022. Hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for mortality-related risk factors were extracted and synthesized in a meta-analysis. The C-statistics, IDI, NRI and DCA were used to assess the stability. A predictive model incorporating independent meta-analytic variables was developed, validated in a clinical cohort and compared with the Giles model.

Results: 35 studies containing 49272 patients were analyzed. A prediction model was established, including age, gender, aneurysm diameter, American Society of Anesthetists score, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, cardiac disease, renal disease, cerebrovascular disease, diabetes, peripheral vascular disease, statins, aspirin, and smoker. The model had a C-statistic of 0.738 (95%CI:0.697, 0.779) in validation cohort, comprising 537 patients after EVAR. The sensitivities were 0.765, 0.796 and 0.756, and the specificities were 0.744, 0.652 and 0.668 at 1/3/5 years. In contrast, Giles model had a C-statistic of 0.657 (95%CI:0.608, 0.706). Integrated discrimination improvement (0.03, p < 0.001; 0.045, p = 0.01; 0.062, p < 0.001) and net reclassification index (0.342, p < 0.001; 0.306, p < 0.001; 0.356, p < 0.001) indicated improved predictive performance by the new model over Giles model.

Conclusion: This meta-analysis-derived AAA long-term mortality prediction model employs precision risk stratification to enhance clinical decision-making and implement personalized follow-up protocols, thereby delivering evidence-based support for clinical practice.

Keywords: Abdominal aortic aneurysm; endovascular aneurysm repair; mortality risk; prediction model; validation.

Plain language summary

Although multiple risk stratification systems have been established for prognostic assessment following endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR), these models exhibit notable limitations. Current paradigms predominantly focus on short-term prognostic evaluation within 30 days to 1 year postoperatively, while demonstrating insufficient capability to predict long-term or all-cause mortality and clinical outcomes. To address these gaps, this study developed a novel predictive model for long-term mortality risk after EVAR through systematic analysis of multicenter, large-scale clinical datasets and incorporation of a comprehensive array of potential prognostic determinants. This model provides clinicians with a more reliable decision-support tool for risk stratification, which may ultimately contribute to enhanced long-term survival rates and improved quality of life in AAA patients.

PubMed Disclaimer

LinkOut - more resources