Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Nov;70(5):617-627.
doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2025.06.041. Epub 2025 Jun 20.

AMPREDICT Mobility-4: A Novel Four Category Mobility Outcome Prediction Model for Patients Undergoing Vascular Amputation

Affiliations

AMPREDICT Mobility-4: A Novel Four Category Mobility Outcome Prediction Model for Patients Undergoing Vascular Amputation

Daniel C Norvell et al. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2025 Nov.

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to create a new mobility outcome prediction model (AMPREDICT Mobility-4) that can be applied at the time a decision is made that amputation is necessary due to an underlying vascular aetiology. It can be used to predict mobility outcome in patients undergoing transmetatarsal (TM), transtibial (TT), or transfemoral (TF) amputation.

Methods: A cohort study retrospectively identified persons with lower limb amputation (LLA) through a large Veterans Affairs dataset, then prospectively enrolled participants to obtain their 12 month post-amputation self reported mobility. Seven hundred and four patients with first unilateral TM, TT, or TF amputation secondary to diabetes and or peripheral arterial disease were identified between February 2021 and September 2022. Potential predictors incorporated factors from the following domains: prior revascularisation; amputation level; demographics; comorbidities; mental health; and health behaviour factors. The predicted mobility outcome included four functional levels: wheelchair mobility; household ambulatory mobility; basic community ambulation; and advanced community ambulation. Multinomial logistic regression was used to fit 1 year post-incident amputation risk prediction models. Variable selection was performed using lasso, a machine learning methodology.

Results: Variable selection led to a final model of 15 predictors that successfully discriminated between all categories of mobility, except household vs. basic community mobility. The model discriminated best when comparing wheelchair mobility with at least some community ambulatory mobility (optimism adjusted c index = 0.71), a basic level of community mobility vs. less than a basic level of community mobility (optimism adjusted c index = 0.70), and advanced community mobility vs. less than advanced community mobility (optimism adjusted c index = 0.73).

Conclusion: The AMPREDICT Mobility-4 model predicted four categories of functional mobility at each of three LLA levels using predictors available in the electronic health record. The model can augment clinical personalised mobility outcome prediction, enhancing both surgeon and patient awareness of the consequences of amputation level on mobility, to facilitate patient surgeon amputation level shared decision-making and assisting in setting appropriate patient outcome expectations.

Keywords: Amputation; Diabetes; Mobility; Peripheral arterial disease; Prediction models.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

None.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) diagram showing the total number of veteran patients identified in the Veterans Affairs (VA) Corporate Data Warehouse (CDW), total numbers and reasons for exclusion, and final number enrolled in the study through mailings and phone interviews. * All consecutive transmetatarsal, transtibial, and transfemoral amputations due to peripheral arterial disease and or diabetes identified during the time period through the VA CDW. ? Exclusions are in order they were applied, horizontally from left to right. Patients with spinal cord injury codes that did not have a hemi- or quadriplegia code. § Prior to their 12 month mobility outcome assessment. Consented and enrolled, but no Amputee Single Item Mobility Measure (AMPSIMM) data collected.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Distributions of predicted probabilities for each Amputee Single Item Mobility Measure (AMPSIMM) category stratified by the actually observed category. The red lines show the prevalence of each AMPSIMM category.

References

    1. Columbo JA, Davies L, Kang R, Barnes JA, Leinweber KA, Suckow BD, et al. Patient experience of recovery after major leg amputation for arterial disease. Vasc Endovascular Surg 2018;52:262–8. - PubMed
    1. Poehler D, Czerniecki J, Norvell D, Henderson A, Dolan J, Devine B. Comparing patient and provider priorities around amputation level outcomes using multiple criteria decision analysis. Ann Vasc Surg 2023;95:169–77. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Suckow BD, Goodney PP, Nolan BW, Veeraswamy RK, Gallagher P, Cronenwett JL, et al. Domains that determine quality of life in vascular amputees. Ann Vasc Surg 2015;29:722–30. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Norvell DC, Czerniecki JM. Risks and risk factors for ipsilateral re-amputation in the first year following first major unilateral dysvascular amputation. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2020;60:614–21. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Anthony T, Roberts J, Modrall JG, Huerta S, Asolati M, Neufeld J, et al. Transmetatarsal amputation: assessment of current selection criteria. Am J Surg 2006;192:e8–11. - PubMed