Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Jun 23.
doi: 10.1007/s00259-025-07423-8. Online ahead of print.

Virtual cutaneous area severity index (vCASI): A comprehensive methodology for quantitative skin disease assessment on positron emission tomography images

Affiliations

Virtual cutaneous area severity index (vCASI): A comprehensive methodology for quantitative skin disease assessment on positron emission tomography images

Aliasghar Mortazi et al. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. .

Abstract

Purpose: Quantification of skin diseases such as cutaneous lymphoma or psoriasis is important for pretreatment planning and response assessment. Currently, this quantification relies on clinical assessments, which are cumbersome, error-prone, and subject to inter-reader variability. FDG-PET/CT is a widely used molecular imaging technique for non-invasive detection and quantification of metabolically active disorders, providing biomarkers of disease extent, severity, and therapeutic response. However, skin disease quantification from PET/CT images remains challenging, error-prone, and labor-intensive.

Methods: We proposed a novel comprehensive methodology called virtual Cutaneous Area Severity Index (vCASI) to quantitatively assess the extent and severity of metabolically active skin disease from FDG-PET/CT images. Firstly, we used an automated body region localization method, followed by a standardization technique for PET images to reduce interscan measurement variability. Then, we generated skin shell PET images and developed a standardized Maximum Intensity Projection (MIP) rendering technique to enable reproducible 3D visualization of the skin with the disease. Finally, we introduced and validated a new quantitative scoring system (vCASI score) to measure the extent and severity of skin disease via these renderings.

Results: Correlations between vCASI scores and reference standard ground-truth assessments increased following the standardization of PET images, further improved with the use of adjusted mean of maximum percentile intensity values as the reference point for MIP rendering, and reached as high as 0.605. Additionally, correlations between repeated vCASI score assessments for the torso, thorax, abdomen, and pelvis exceeded 0.85, demonstrating high repeatability.

Conclusions: The vCASI methodology allows for accurate and reproducible quantitative assessment of the extent and severity of metabolically active skin diseases, such as cutaneous lymphoma and psoriasis, from FDG-PET/CT images. It addresses the challenges related to body region localization, non-standardness of PET images, robust visualization, and standardized display of PET images to detect and quantify skin disease. Additionally, it overcomes the lack of a practical and validated scoring system for quantifying skin disease on PET images. We demonstrated that the vCASI scoring system has high repeatability and good accuracy, and is optimized by the proposed methodology.

Keywords: Cutaneous lymphoma; Positron emission tomography; Psoriasis; Quantification; Scoring system; Skin disease.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declarations. Ethics approval and consent to participate: This retrospective study was performed in line with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki and the Belmont Report. Approval was granted by the Institutional Review Board of the University of Pennsylvania along with a HIPAA waiver and informed consent waiver. Consent to publish: Not applicable. Competing interests: The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.

Similar articles

References

    1. Lakhani R, Prakash C, Tiwari S, Purohit S, Paliwal V, Mathur DK, Bhargava P. Scoring system in dermatology: a review. J Dental Med Sci. 2016;15:89–99.
    1. Wu AG, Conway J, Barazani L, Roy B, Cline A, Pereira F. Is clear always clear? Comparison of Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) and the Physician’s Global Assessment (PGA) in psoriasis clearance. Dermatol Ther. 2020;10:1155–63. - DOI
    1. Uysal Pİ, Akdoğan N, Falay M, Şahin B, Özet G, Yalçın B. The importance of baseline screening investigations and modified severity weighted assessment tool in patients with early stage mycosis fungoides: A Four-year retrospective study. Turk J Dermatol. 2019;13:1–7. - DOI
    1. Cevenini G, Furini S, Barbini P, Tognetti L, Rubegni P. Scoring systems in dermatology. In2016 IEEE Int Symp Med Meas Appl. 2016;1–6. https://doi.org/10.1109/MeMeA.2016.7533793
    1. Dummer R, Vermeer MH, Scarisbrick JJ, Kim YH, Stonesifer C, Tensen CP, et al. Cutaneous T cell lymphoma. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2021;7:61. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources