Redefining Representativeness of a Sample in Causal Terms
- PMID: 40545908
- PMCID: PMC12183537
- DOI: 10.1111/jep.70137
Redefining Representativeness of a Sample in Causal Terms
Abstract
Rationale: Despite its crucial role, sample representativeness remains a controversial topic in the methodology of medical science. There is an ongoing debate not only about how best to define and ensure the representativeness of a sample (e.g., Rudolph et al. 2023; Porta 2016), but also about whether representativeness is worth pursuing at all (e.g., Rothman et al. 2013).
Aims and objectives: Our aim is to construct a formalised, precise, and practical conceptualisation of sample representativeness.
Methods: We employ the established framework of causal Bayesian networks to develop such a conceptualisation.
Results: We propose a precise formal definition of sample representativeness that translates into clear and actionable methodological guidance. Additionally, we provide examples and a checklist to illustrate the application of the proposed conceptualisation.
Conclusion: We believe that the presented definition will facilitate further discussion of the issue of representativeness and prove useful to scientists in practice.
© 2025 The Author(s). Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Figures
References
-
- Cox D. R., Principles of Statistical Inference (Cambridge University Press, 2006).
-
- Bernardo J. M., “The Concept of Exchangeability and Its Applications,” Far East Journal of Mathematical Sciences 4 (1996): 111–121.
-
- Nohr E. A. and Olsen J., “Commentary: Epidemiologists Have Debated Representativeness for More Than 40 Years Has the Time Come to Move On?,” International Journal of Epidemiology 42, no. 4 (2013): 1016–1017. - PubMed
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
