Outcomes of Rotator Cuff Repair: Open vs. Arthroscopic Approaches in Patients with Diabetes or Hyperlipidemia
- PMID: 40546245
- PMCID: PMC12180584
- DOI: 10.26502/josm.511500201
Outcomes of Rotator Cuff Repair: Open vs. Arthroscopic Approaches in Patients with Diabetes or Hyperlipidemia
Abstract
Rotator cuff injuries are a common cause of shoulder dysfunction, with diabetes mellitus and hyperlipidemia contributing to increased tendon vulnerability and impaired healing. In this article, a critical evaluation is presented on the comparative outcomes of open versus arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (RCR) in patients with these metabolic conditions. Findings suggest that arthroscopic RCR compared to open RCR offers advantages such as reduced tissue disruption, shorter recovery times, and lower infection rates, making it a preferred choice for metabolically compromised patients. However, open RCR provides superior visualization and structural support, as well as better function, benefiting patients with extensive tendon damage. In diabetics there was higher retear and infection rates than non-diabetics, particularly with open RCR, while those with hyperlipidemia exhibited impaired tendon healing and increased postoperative complications, with mixed effects from statin therapy. Despite these findings, existing research lacks large-scale, controlled studies directly comparing surgical outcomes in these high-risk populations. Given the chronic inflammatory and metabolic impairments associated with diabetes mellitus and hyperlipidemia, surgical decisions should be tailored to patient-specific factors, including lipid and glycemic control, tendon integrity, and tear severity. Arthroscopy appears to be the preferable option due to minimizing surgical trauma, lower retear rates and faster return-to-work times; meanwhile, open repair remains valuable in cases requiring extensive intervention.
Keywords: Arthroscopy; Diabetes mellitus; Hyperglycemia; Hyperlipidemia; Post-operative complications; Rotator cuff injury; Rotator cuff repair.
Conflict of interest statement
Competing interests: All authors have read the manuscript and declare no conflict of interest. No writing assistance was utilized in the production of this manuscript.
Figures



Similar articles
-
Perioperative Losartan Is Associated With Similar Rates of Additional Surgical Procedures for Postoperative Shoulder Stiffness After Primary Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair but Lower Rates of Secondary Debridement and Repair.Arthroscopy. 2025 Jul;41(7):2214-2221. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2024.11.084. Epub 2024 Dec 2. Arthroscopy. 2025. PMID: 39631477
-
The effects of smoking on clinical and structural outcomes after rotator cuff repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis.J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2022 Mar;31(3):656-667. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2021.10.026. Epub 2021 Nov 20. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2022. PMID: 34813890
-
Social determinants of health influence clinical outcomes of patients undergoing rotator cuff repair: a systematic review.J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2023 Feb;32(2):419-434. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2022.09.007. Epub 2022 Oct 14. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2023. PMID: 36252786
-
Subcoracoid Cyst: A Possible Predictive Marker for Postoperative Retears of Rotator Cuff After Arthroscopic Repair.Orthop J Sports Med. 2025 Jun 16;13(6):23259671251341914. doi: 10.1177/23259671251341914. eCollection 2025 Jun. Orthop J Sports Med. 2025. PMID: 40535588 Free PMC article.
-
Editorial Commentary: Tension of the Repair During Rotator Cuff Surgery Appears to Matter More Than Medial-Lateral Footprint Coverage.Arthroscopy. 2025 Jul;41(7):2269-2270. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2025.02.022. Epub 2025 Feb 26. Arthroscopy. 2025. PMID: 40021067
References
-
- Maruvada S, Madrazo-Ibarra A, Anatomy VMA, Cuff R (2023). https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK441844/
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources