Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Case Reports
. 2025 May 21;17(5):e84575.
doi: 10.7759/cureus.84575. eCollection 2025 May.

Clinical Lessons From a Case of Retained Non-absorbable Suture After Uterine Compression

Ken Takahashi  1 , Nozomu Yanaihara  1 , Hiroshi Kishi  1 , Osamu Samura  1 , Aikou Okamoto  1
Affiliations
Case Reports

Clinical Lessons From a Case of Retained Non-absorbable Suture After Uterine Compression

Ken Takahashi et al. Cureus. .

Abstract

Postpartum bleeding is commonly addressed with uterine compression using absorbable sutures; however, possible complications associated with non-absorbable threads are not well documented. We present a case in which a non-absorbable thread was mistakenly used to perform uterine compression sutures to treat postpartum uterine bleeding. Non-invasive methods, such as magnetic resonance imaging and hysteroscopy, failed to assess the sutures. As the patient wanted to have another child, diagnostic laparoscopy was performed one year later; the suture thread was still present, and a gap had formed between the thread and uterus, posing a risk for intestinal obstruction. The suture thread was successfully removed, and fertility treatment was resumed. This case highlights the dangers of using a non-absorbable thread for uterine compression sutures and the importance of promptly removing these sutures to avoid complications. Simulation training and pre-prepared suture materials are essential to prevent such errors. This case highlights the clinical risks associated with the use of non-absorbable sutures for uterine compression and the necessity of prompt identification and intervention to protect reproductive health.

Keywords: complication; non-absorbable suture; non-absorbable thread; postpartum hemorrhage; uterine atony; uterine compression suture.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Human subjects: Consent for treatment and open access publication was obtained or waived by all participants in this study. The Ethics Committee of Jikei Hospital issued approval 36-069(12168). This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Jikei Hospital and adhered to the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. Conflicts of interest: In compliance with the ICMJE uniform disclosure form, all authors declare the following: Payment/services info: All authors have declared that no financial support was received from any organization for the submitted work. Financial relationships: All authors have declared that they have no financial relationships at present or within the previous three years with any organizations that might have an interest in the submitted work. Other relationships: All authors have declared that there are no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Uterine compression suture using a non-absorbable thread.
(a) Uterine compression suture technique partially based on the Matsubara–Yano method. A needle was inserted through the anterior uterine wall slightly above the uterine incision and passed through the posterior wall, and a strong compression suture was placed at the uterine fundus to compress the uterus. The procedure was performed bilaterally. To prevent the sutures from slipping laterally, an additional suture was placed in the lower uterine segment (yellow arrow). No sutures were applied to the upper uterine body, as the myometrial layer in this area was too thick to allow safe needle passage. (b) Absorbable thread (left) and non-absorbable thread (right). Both had similar straight needles.
Figure 2
Figure 2. Evaluation of non-absorbable sutures using non-invasive methods.
(a, b) T2-weighted MRI images six months postoperatively. Low-signal images indicating hemosiderin deposition were observed at the locations where the compression sutures had been placed; however, the sutures were not visible. (c-e) Hysteroscopic images taken one year postoperatively. (c) No obvious abnormal findings were observed in the area around the right fallopian tube opening. (d) No adhesions or sutures were observed in the uterine cavity. (e) No obvious abnormalities were observed in the area around the left fallopian tube opening.
Figure 3
Figure 3. Findings of diagnostic laparoscopy.
(a, b) The thread remained in the same condition as it was at the time of application. (c) A large space was formed between the uterus and the suture thread, posing a risk of the intestinal tract becoming embedded within it.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Global causes of maternal death: a WHO systematic analysis. Say L, Chou D, Gemmill A, et al. Lancet Glob Health. 2014;2:0–33. - PubMed
    1. Postpartum hemorrhage: prevention and treatment. Evensen A, Anderson JM, Fontaine P. https://www.aafp.org/pubs/afp/issues/2017/0401/p442.html. Am Fam Physician. 2017;95:442–449. - PubMed
    1. The B-Lynch surgical technique for the control of massive postpartum haemorrhage: an alternative to hysterectomy? Five cases reported. B-Lynch C, Coker A, Lawal AH, Abu J, Cowen MJ. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1997;104:372–375. - PubMed
    1. Uterine compression suture against impending recurrence of uterine inversion immediately after laparotomy repositioning. Matsubara S, Yano H, Taneichi A, Suzuki M. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2009;35:819–823. - PubMed
    1. Menstrual, fertility and psychological impacts after uterine compression sutures for postpartum hemorrhage: a prospective cohort study. Kwong LT, Wong SF, So PL. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2023;23:217. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources