Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Jun 19:11:23779608251345276.
doi: 10.1177/23779608251345276. eCollection 2025 Jan-Dec.

Psychometric Evaluation of the Persian Version of the Professional Socialization Scale for Hospital Nurses: A Methodological Study

Amir Jalali  1 , Azam Sharifi  2 , Ali Akbar Vaisi Raygani  2 , Faezeh Ghesmati  3 , Amirhossein Naghibzadeh  4 , Nazanin Mardani Taghvostani  4 , Khalil Moradi  2
Affiliations

Psychometric Evaluation of the Persian Version of the Professional Socialization Scale for Hospital Nurses: A Methodological Study

Amir Jalali et al. SAGE Open Nurs. .

Abstract

Introduction: Professional socialization is a critical process that influences hospital nurses' professional identity, competence, and ethical standards, ultimately impacting the quality of patient care.

Objective: This study aimed to translate the Professional Socialization Scale (PSS) for Hospital Nurses into Persian and evaluate its psychometric properties among Iranian nurses.

Methods: A cross-sectional methodological study was conducted in two phases: translation and psychometric evaluation. A stratified sample of 511 nurses from both public and private hospitals in Kermanshah City, Iran, participated in the study. The scale was translated into Persian using the Douglas and Craig model, and its content and face validity were assessed. Construct validity was evaluated through exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). The internal consistency of the scale was assessed using Cronbach's alpha and McDonald's omega coefficients, while test-retest reliability was evaluated using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC).

Results: The PSS scale maintained the meaning of the original English version and was clear and understandable for hospital nurses. In qualitative face validity, one item changed slightly and all items were retained in the quantitative face validity assessment. Each item's content validity ratio ranges from 0.71 to 1, the Item content validity index ranges from 0.79 to 1, while the Scale-level Content Validity Index was 0.89. The EFA and CFA confirmed a four-factor structure of the Persian version of the scale, with 21 items explaining 67.72% of the total variance. The model fit indices indicated excellent model fit. The scale demonstrated acceptable internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = 0.908, McDonald's omega = 0.904) and test-retest reliability (ICC = 0.908).

Conclusion: The Persian version of the PSS for Hospital Nurses is a valid and reliable instrument. Nursing managers should facilitate the professional socialization process for nurses. This scale can be used to assess the socialization of nurses and guide their career development.

Keywords: nurse; professional socialization; psychometrics; reliability; validity.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Scree plot of the extracted components of the Professional Socialization Scale.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Final measurement model of the Professional Socialization Scale from confirmatory factor analysis (N = 311).
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

References

    1. Amaniyan S., Nobahar M., Raiesdana N. (2021). The effect of media on nursing image in societies: A systematic review. Qom University of Medical Sciences Journal, 15(7), 454–463. 10.32598/qums.15.7.2219.2 - DOI
    1. Boateng G. O., Neilands T. B., Frongillo E. A., Melgar-Quiñonez H. R., Young S. L. (2018). Best practices for developing and validating scales for health, social, and behavioral research: A primer. Frontiers in Public Health, 6, 149. 10.3389/fpubh.2018.00149 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Brown J., Stevens J., Kermode S. (2013). Measuring student nurse professional socialisation: The development and implementation of a new instrument. Nurse Education Today, 33(6), 565–573. 10.1016/j.nedt.2012.06.013 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bujang M. A., Ab Ghani P., Soelar S. A., Zulkifli N. A. (2012). Sample size guideline for exploratory factor analysis when using small sample: Taking into considerations of different measurement scales. Paper presented at the 2012 International Conference on Statistics in Science, Business and Engineering (ICSSBE).
    1. Carpenter S. (2018). Ten steps in scale development and reporting: A guide for researchers. Communication Methods and Measures, 12(1), 25–44. 10.1080/19312458.2017.1396583 - DOI

LinkOut - more resources