Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 May 30;14(5):958-967.
doi: 10.21037/gs-2025-116. Epub 2025 May 27.

The triple-plane technique: a surgical technique for subpectoral implant-based breast reconstruction

Affiliations

The triple-plane technique: a surgical technique for subpectoral implant-based breast reconstruction

Yue He et al. Gland Surg. .

Abstract

Breast reconstruction surgery is an important part of breast cancer treatment. However, implant-based breast reconstruction is associated with a number of complications, such as infection, seroma, prosthesis exposure, and skin erythema. In this study, we propose a novel surgical technique for implant-based breast reconstruction-the triple-plane technique. This technique positions the prosthesis in a complete submuscular plane. Medially, it is subpectoral, and inferolaterally it is covered by a flap of serratus anterior and latissimus dorsi fascia. As such, the prosthesis is not in contact with the skin, thereby reducing postoperative complications. This article reports on the breast reconstruction results of 96 breast cancer patients who underwent unilateral breast reconstruction surgery using the triple-plane technique at Hunan Cancer Hospital. The results show that breast appearance after surgery was rated as excellent by 92 (95.83%) patients, and good by 4 (4.17%) patients. The average operation time, surgical incision, intraoperative blood loss, and hospitalization time of patients were 88.40±12.13 minutes, 12.24±4.01 cm, 46.40±10.73 mL, and 7.23±1.00 days, respectively. Skin necrosis at the edge of the incision was observed in 1 (1.04%) patient, which healed normally after debridement and closure. The scores of BREAST-Q patient-reported outcome measure ranged from 80 to 100 points for all of the patients. These results demonstrate that the triple-plane technique offers a novel and safe technique for breast reconstruction surgery.

Keywords: Breast reconstruction; postoperative complications; prosthesis implantation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form (available at https://gs.amegroups.com/article/view/10.21037/gs-2025-116/coif). The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Breast reconstruction surgery using the triple-plane technique (right breast, the three circles indicate three anatomical planes): pectoralis major muscle plane (A-plane); serratus anterior fascia plane lateral to the pectoralis major (B-plane), and deep layer of the superficial fascia beneath the pectoralis major (C-plane) (both the lateral and lower planes are connected to the pectoralis major through the deep layer of the superficial fascia, allowing for an increase in area based on the size of the prosthesis placed as needed).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Images of breast reconstruction operation using the triple-plane technique. (A) Dissection the retromammary space while preserving the deep layer of the superficial fascia along the lateral margin of the pectoralis major muscle surface. (B) Dissection along the deep layer of the superficial fascia. (C) Detachment of the pectoralis major muscle insertion at the inferior pole of the breast. (D) Dissection of C-plane after prosthesis placement.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Comparison of a patient’s breasts before and after triple-plane breast reconstruction. The same patients were compared preoperatively (A,B) and postoperatively (C,D) with standardized positions.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Comparison of reconstructed breasts after radiotherapy with contralateral breasts in two patients (the photographs were used with the patient’s authorization). (A) Patient A: breast appearance of the reconstructed right breast 3 months after radiotherapy and the left breast. (B) Patient B: breast appearance of the reconstructed right breast 3 months after radiotherapy and the left breast.

Similar articles

References

    1. Gardani M, Bertozzi N, Grieco MP, et al. Breast reconstruction with anatomical implants: A review of indications and techniques based on current literature. Ann Med Surg (Lond) 2017;21:96-104. 10.1016/j.amsu.2017.07.047 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Colwell AS, Taylor EM. Recent Advances in Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2020;145:421e-32e. 10.1097/PRS.0000000000006510 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Zehra S, Doyle F, Barry M, et al. Health-related quality of life following breast reconstruction compared to total mastectomy and breast-conserving surgery among breast cancer survivors: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Breast Cancer 2020;27:534-66. 10.1007/s12282-020-01076-1 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Santosa KB, Qi J, Kim HM, et al. Long-term Patient-Reported Outcomes in Postmastectomy Breast Reconstruction. JAMA Surg 2018;153:891-9. 10.1001/jamasurg.2018.1677 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Xing J, Jia Z, Xu Y, et al. A Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis of Complications Related to Breast Reconstruction Using Different Skin Flaps After Breast Cancer Surgery. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2022;46:1525-41. 10.1007/s00266-022-02828-4 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources