Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2025 Jun 20;8(6):e70937.
doi: 10.1002/hsr2.70937. eCollection 2025 Jun.

Recovery Profiles and Well-Being Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Various Anaesthesia Techniques: A Systematic Review

Affiliations
Review

Recovery Profiles and Well-Being Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Various Anaesthesia Techniques: A Systematic Review

Abdullah K Bubshait. Health Sci Rep. .

Abstract

Background and aim: An appropriate anaesthesia technique is considered for the patient's health status to ensure a painless recovery. This study explored the important role of anesthesia selection in improving recovery outcomes and patient well-being across diverse surgical settings.

Methods: This study employed a systematic literature review methodology. Different databases, including Scopus, Google Scholar, and PubMed, were used to search for potential studies. A total of 20 studies were selected for qualitative analysis.

Results: We found that general anesthesia is widely favored. However, certain procedures stressed the efficacy of spinal and regional approaches in managing pain and promoting faster recovery. Intravenous anesthetics such as propofol and newer agents like remimazolam and ciprofol are associated with improved recovery rates in high-risk patients, providing hemodynamic stability and reducing the risk of postoperative nausea and vomiting. Furthermore, Opioid-sparing and xenon-based anesthetics also contributed to better recovery profiles.

Conclusion: Anesthesia choice plays a critical role in patient recovery, with tailored techniques enhancing outcomes and reducing adverse effects.

Keywords: anesthesia; anesthetics; hemodynamics; propofol; xenon.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The author declares no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
PRISMA framework.

References

    1. Lamperti M., Romero C. S., Guarracino F., et al., “Preoperative Assessment of Adults Undergoing Elective Noncardiac Surgery: Updated Guidelines From the European Society of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care,” European Journal of Anaesthesiology|EJA 42, no. 1 (January 2025): 1–35. - PubMed
    1. Forte S., Ferrari F. A., Majd H. S., Cisotto F., and Ferrari F., “Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) In Gynecology: State of the Art and the Problem of Barriers,” Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology 50, no. 1 (2023): 14.
    1. Teeuwen P. H. E., Bleichrodt R. P., Strik C., et al., “Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Versus Conventional Postoperative Care in Colorectal Surgery,” Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery 14, no. 1 (2010): 88–95. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Nisanevich V., Felsenstein I., Almogy G., Weissman C., Einav S., and Matot I., “Effect of Intraoperative Fluid Management on Outcome After Intraabdominal Surgery,” Anesthesiology 103, no. 1 (July 2005): 25–32. - PubMed
    1. Lewis S. J., Andersen H. K., and Thomas S., “Early Enteral Nutrition Within 24 h of Intestinal Surgery Versus Later Commencement of Feeding: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis,” Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery 13, no. 3 (March 2009): 569–575. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources