Outcomes of robotic and endoscopic combined aortic and mitral valve surgery: experience from National Taiwan University Hospital
- PMID: 40547423
- PMCID: PMC12177771
- DOI: 10.21037/acs-2024-ravr-0185
Outcomes of robotic and endoscopic combined aortic and mitral valve surgery: experience from National Taiwan University Hospital
Abstract
Background: Minimally invasive approaches in cardiac surgery have transformed the field by reducing surgical trauma and improving recovery outcomes. The lateral approach, using robotic and endoscopic technologies, offers superior visualization for complex procedures, such as combined aortic and mitral valve surgery. Addressing concurrent pathologies in the aortic and mitral valves increases procedural complexity, requiring precise techniques and optimal patient selection.
Methods: This retrospective, single-center study evaluated adult patients who underwent robotic or endoscopic combined aortic and mitral valve surgery between January 2015 and November 2024. Data on patient demographics, perioperative details, and postoperative outcomes including complications, mortality rates, and improvements in New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional status were analyzed.
Results: A total of 67 patients were included, with 8 undergoing robotic and 59 endoscopic procedures. No mortality or conversion to open surgery was observed. Postoperative complications were minimal, with a low infection rate of 1.5% and an atrial fibrillation rate of 26.8%. Over 85% of patients experienced significant improvement in NYHA functional status.
Conclusions: Robotic and endoscopic combined aortic and mitral valve surgery using the lateral approach is safe and effective, yielding excellent outcomes in a well-selected patient population.
Keywords: Robotic valve surgery; combined aortic and mitral valve surgery; endoscopic cardiac surgery; lateral approach; minimally invasive cardiac surgery.
Copyright © 2025 AME Publishing Company. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflicts of Interest: The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.
Figures



Similar articles
-
Limited versus full sternotomy for aortic valve replacement.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Apr 10;4(4):CD011793. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011793.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017. Update in: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Dec 6;12:CD011793. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011793.pub3. PMID: 28394022 Free PMC article. Updated.
-
Establishing a robotic aortic valve replacement program in Spain: growing opportunities for Europe.Ann Cardiothorac Surg. 2025 May 31;14(3):218-224. doi: 10.21037/acs-2025-ravr-0003. Epub 2025 May 29. Ann Cardiothorac Surg. 2025. PMID: 40547431 Free PMC article.
-
Endovascular treatment for ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 May 26;5(5):CD005261. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005261.pub4. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017. PMID: 28548204 Free PMC article.
-
Laparoscopic surgery for elective abdominal aortic aneurysm repair.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 May 4;5(5):CD012302. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012302.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017. PMID: 28471523 Free PMC article.
-
Clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer: systematic reviews and economic evaluation.Health Technol Assess. 2006 Nov;10(45):1-141, iii-iv. doi: 10.3310/hta10450. Health Technol Assess. 2006. PMID: 17083853
References
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources