Impact of spinopelvic parameters on acetabular cup positioning and patient-reported outcomes following total hip arthroplasty
- PMID: 40547811
- PMCID: PMC12176686
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jor.2025.05.005
Impact of spinopelvic parameters on acetabular cup positioning and patient-reported outcomes following total hip arthroplasty
Abstract
Background: Hip instability is one of the most common complications after total hip arthroplasty (THA). While prior research has explored patient factors, surgical technique, soft tissue dynamics, implant design, and spinopelvic parameters. In particular, the relationship between spinopelvic alignment and acetabular cup positioning is not yet fully understood. Therefore, we aim to evaluate the association between spinopelvic parameters, acetabular cup positioning, and 12-month postoperative PROMs.
Methods: This study included 90 patients undergoing primary THA at a single institution from March 2019 to May 2023. Pelvic parameters (acetabular inclination, acetabular version, pelvic incidence, pelvic tilt, sacral slope, flexion, and obliquity) were assessed using EOS imaging and radiographs. Additional data were obtained from the Veterans RAND-12 survey and the FORCE-TJR database. PROMs were collected preoperatively, at 3 months, and at 12 months postoperatively, along with postoperative hospital metrics. Statistical analysis included Pearson's correlation to evaluate associations between pelvic parameters and PROMs.
Results: Postoperatively, 1.1 % of patients required reoperation, 2.2 % experienced dislocation, 5.5 % were readmitted within 90 days, and 12.1 % had complications, though none were associated with spinopelvic parameters or cup positioning. Acetabular cup inclination was significantly correlated with pelvic tilt (R = 0.30, p = 0.003), while acetabular version showed negative correlations with pelvic incidence (R = -0.23, p = 0.02) and sacral slope (R = -0.31, p = 0.002). At 12 months, acetabular inclination predicted improvement in MCS (R = 0.28, p = 0.02), and obliquity predicted improvements in activities of daily living (R = 0.29, p = 0.02), pain (R = 0.28, p = 0.03), and quality of life (R = 0.30, p = 0.002).
Conclusion: In the first year after THA, acetabular inclination was linked to improved patient-reported outcomes, while greater pelvic obliquity was associated with better scores in activities of daily living, pain, and quality of life. Post-operative acetabular cup version had weak correlations with pelvic incidence, sacral slope, and pelvic tilt. No other associations were found between spinopelvic parameters, cup positioning, and instability or complications.
Keywords: Acetabular cup positioning; Hip instability; Patient-reported outcome measures; Postoperative complications; Spinopelvic parameters; Total hip arthroplasty.
© 2025 Published by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of Professor P K Surendran Memorial Education Foundation.
Conflict of interest statement
AHD discloses the following, receives royalties from Spineart and 10.13039/100008894Stryker, consulting fees from Medtornic, research support from Alphatec, Medtronic, and 10.13039/100019958Orthofix, and Fellowship support from Medtronic. VA is a consultant for Johnson & Johnson. The remaining authors have no disclosures.
Similar articles
-
What Are the Functional, Radiographic, and Survivorship Outcomes of a Modified Cup-cage Technique for Pelvic Discontinuity?Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Dec 1;482(12):2149-2160. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003186. Epub 2024 Jul 9. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024. PMID: 38991223
-
A Novel "Personalized Safe Zone" for Acetabular Cup Placement During Total Hip Arthroplasty in Patients With Spinopelvic Pathology: Concept, Construction, and Clinical Application.Orthop Surg. 2025 Sep;17(9):2596-2607. doi: 10.1111/os.70129. Epub 2025 Aug 5. Orthop Surg. 2025. PMID: 40761098
-
The CCJR® Charles A. Engh, Sr, MD. Excellence in Hip Research Award: Pelvic Tilt and Cup Position Change Significantly in Most Young Patients 10 Years after Hip Arthroplasty.J Arthroplasty. 2025 Aug;40(8S1):S25-S29. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2025.03.055. Epub 2025 Mar 26. J Arthroplasty. 2025. PMID: 40147781
-
Assistive devices, hip precautions, environmental modifications and training to prevent dislocation and improve function after hip arthroplasty.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Jul 4;7(7):CD010815. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010815.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016. PMID: 27374001 Free PMC article.
-
Spinopelvic alignment and precise cup placement in total hip arthroplasty - A systematic review.J Orthop. 2024 Aug 14;60:105-114. doi: 10.1016/j.jor.2024.08.008. eCollection 2025 Feb. J Orthop. 2024. PMID: 39399321 Review.
References
-
- Joint Replacement Surgery [Internet]. [cited 2025 Apr 8]. Available from: https://rheumatology.org/patients/joint-replacement-surgery.
-
- Singh J.A., Yu S., Chen L., Cleveland J.D. Rates of total Joint replacement in the United States: future Projections to 2020-2040 using the national inpatient sample. J Rheumatol. 2019 Sep;46(9):1134–1140. - PubMed
-
- Anderson C.G., Jang S.J., Brilliant Z.R., et al. Complication rate after primary total hip arthroplasty using the posterior approach and enabling technology: a consecutive series of 2,888 hips. J Arthroplast. 2023 Jul;38(7S):S119–S123.e3. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources