The Impact of Social Deprivation on Phalangeal Fracture Operative Treatment Outcomes
- PMID: 40548123
- PMCID: PMC12179594
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsg.2025.100765
The Impact of Social Deprivation on Phalangeal Fracture Operative Treatment Outcomes
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the relationship between social determinants of health and outcomes following phalangeal fracture surgery using the Area Deprivation Index.
Methods: A retrospective chart review was performed on patients ≥18 years old who underwent surgical fixation of a proximal, middle, or distal phalangeal fracture at our level I trauma center from January 2006 to December 2018. Surgical techniques included open reduction and internal fixation, closed reduction and percutaneous pinning, intramedullary fixation, and external fixation. Patients with multiple fractures or who required nonsurgical treatment were excluded. Demographics, comorbidities, range of motion, visual analog scale pain scores, and Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (QuickDASH) scores were analyzed. The Area Deprivation Index categorized patients into terciles by their relative deprivation level. Statistical tests included analysis of variance, chi-square tests, and multivariate logistic regression.
Results: In total, 194 patients were included. The most deprived group had a greater proportion of Black/African Americans. No significant differences were observed in fracture patterns, surgical technique, or implant utilization. Preoperative pain scores were greater in the most deprived group (6.05 ± 2.61) compared with the least deprived group (3.95 ± 2.80). Postoperative pain was also higher in the most deprived group (2.14 ± 2.46) versus the least deprived group (0.50 ± 0.73). Preoperative QuickDASH scores were greater in the most deprived group (61.36 ± 22.94) compared with the intermediately deprived group (46.04 ± 20.59).
Conclusions: Social deprivation may influence preoperative and postoperative pain in phalangeal fracture surgery. Considering socioeconomic factors could help address underlying disparities and enhance patient recovery.
Type of study/level of evidence: Prognostic III.
Keywords: Fracture; Hand; Phalangeal; Phalanx; Social.
© 2025 The Authors.
Conflict of interest statement
No benefits in any form have been received or will be received related directly to this article.
Figures


Similar articles
-
Interventions for treating supracondylar elbow fractures in children.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Jun 9;6(6):CD013609. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013609.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022. PMID: 35678077 Free PMC article.
-
What Is the Relative Effectiveness of the Various Surgical Treatment Options for Distal Radius Fractures? A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2021 Feb 1;479(2):348-362. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000001524. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2021. PMID: 33165042 Free PMC article.
-
Cephalomedullary nails versus extramedullary implants for extracapsular hip fractures in older adults.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Jan 26;1(1):CD000093. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000093.pub6. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022. PMID: 35080771 Free PMC article.
-
Negative pressure wound therapy for surgical wounds healing by primary closure.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Apr 26;4(4):CD009261. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009261.pub7. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022. PMID: 35471497 Free PMC article.
-
Interventions for treating proximal humeral fractures in adults.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Jun 21;6(6):CD000434. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000434.pub5. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022. PMID: 35727196 Free PMC article.
References
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials