Voices that matter: The impact of patient-reported outcome measures on clinical decision-making
- PMID: 40548214
- PMCID: PMC11612728
- DOI: 10.5662/wjm.v15.i2.98066
Voices that matter: The impact of patient-reported outcome measures on clinical decision-making
Abstract
The critical role of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in enhancing clinical decision-making and promoting patient-centered care has gained a profound significance in scientific research. PROMs encapsulate a patient's health status directly from their perspective, encompassing various domains such as symptom severity, functional status, and overall quality of life. By integrating PROMs into routine clinical practice and research, healthcare providers can achieve a more nuanced understanding of patient experiences and tailor treatments accordingly. The deployment of PROMs supports dynamic patient-provider interactions, fostering better patient engagement and adherence to treatment plans. Moreover, PROMs are pivotal in clinical settings for monitoring disease progression and treatment efficacy, particularly in chronic and mental health conditions. However, challenges in implementing PROMs include data collection and management, integration into existing health systems, and acceptance by patients and providers. Overcoming these barriers necessitates technological advancements, policy development, and continuous education to enhance the acceptability and effectiveness of PROMs. The paper concludes with recommendations for future research and policy-making aimed at optimizing the use and impact of PROMs across healthcare settings.
Keywords: Clinical decision-making; Data management; Healthcare technology; Patient-centered care; Patient-reported outcome measures; Policy development.
©The Author(s) 2025. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflict-of-interest statement: All authors declare no conflict of interest in publishing the manuscript.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Routine provision of feedback from patient-reported outcome measurements to healthcare providers and patients in clinical practice.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Oct 12;10(10):CD011589. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011589.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021. PMID: 34637526 Free PMC article.
-
Shared decision-making for people with asthma.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Oct 3;10(10):CD012330. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012330.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017. PMID: 28972652 Free PMC article.
-
Interventions for preventing and reducing the use of physical restraints of older people in general hospital settings.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Aug 25;8(8):CD012476. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012476.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022. PMID: 36004796 Free PMC article.
-
Home treatment for mental health problems: a systematic review.Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(15):1-139. doi: 10.3310/hta5150. Health Technol Assess. 2001. PMID: 11532236
-
NIH Consensus Statement on Management of Hepatitis C: 2002.NIH Consens State Sci Statements. 2002 Jun 10-12;19(3):1-46. NIH Consens State Sci Statements. 2002. PMID: 14768714
Cited by
-
Challenges in the clinical translation of stromal vascular fraction therapy in regenerative medicine.World J Stem Cells. 2025 Jun 26;17(6):103775. doi: 10.4252/wjsc.v17.i6.103775. World J Stem Cells. 2025. PMID: 40585955 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Nelson EC, Eftimovska E, Lind C, Hager A, Wasson JH, Lindblad S. Patient reported outcome measures in practice. BMJ. 2015;350:g7818. - PubMed
-
- Kingsley C, Patel S. Patient-reported outcome measures and patient-reported experience measures. BJA Education. 2017;17:137–144.
Publication types
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources