Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2025 Jun 20;15(2):98066.
doi: 10.5662/wjm.v15.i2.98066.

Voices that matter: The impact of patient-reported outcome measures on clinical decision-making

Affiliations
Review

Voices that matter: The impact of patient-reported outcome measures on clinical decision-making

Naveen Jeyaraman et al. World J Methodol. .

Abstract

The critical role of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in enhancing clinical decision-making and promoting patient-centered care has gained a profound significance in scientific research. PROMs encapsulate a patient's health status directly from their perspective, encompassing various domains such as symptom severity, functional status, and overall quality of life. By integrating PROMs into routine clinical practice and research, healthcare providers can achieve a more nuanced understanding of patient experiences and tailor treatments accordingly. The deployment of PROMs supports dynamic patient-provider interactions, fostering better patient engagement and adherence to treatment plans. Moreover, PROMs are pivotal in clinical settings for monitoring disease progression and treatment efficacy, particularly in chronic and mental health conditions. However, challenges in implementing PROMs include data collection and management, integration into existing health systems, and acceptance by patients and providers. Overcoming these barriers necessitates technological advancements, policy development, and continuous education to enhance the acceptability and effectiveness of PROMs. The paper concludes with recommendations for future research and policy-making aimed at optimizing the use and impact of PROMs across healthcare settings.

Keywords: Clinical decision-making; Data management; Healthcare technology; Patient-centered care; Patient-reported outcome measures; Policy development.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict-of-interest statement: All authors declare no conflict of interest in publishing the manuscript.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The patient-reported outcome measures cycle. PROMs: Patient-reported outcome measures.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Kluzek S, Dean B, Wartolowska KA. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) as proof of treatment efficacy. BMJ Evid Based Med. 2022;27:153–155. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Nelson EC, Eftimovska E, Lind C, Hager A, Wasson JH, Lindblad S. Patient reported outcome measures in practice. BMJ. 2015;350:g7818. - PubMed
    1. Kingsley C, Patel S. Patient-reported outcome measures and patient-reported experience measures. BJA Education. 2017;17:137–144.
    1. Weldring T, Smith SM. Patient-Reported Outcomes (PROs) and Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) Health Serv Insights. 2013;6:61–68. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Field J, Holmes MM, Newell D. PROMs data: can it be used to make decisions for individual patients? A narrative review. Patient Relat Outcome Meas. 2019;10:233–241. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources