Scaling up: Facilitators, barriers, and EDI considerations for clinical implementation of a stepped-care early mental health parenting program (I-InTERACT-North)
- PMID: 40548260
- PMCID: PMC12179477
- DOI: 10.1177/26334895251346816
Scaling up: Facilitators, barriers, and EDI considerations for clinical implementation of a stepped-care early mental health parenting program (I-InTERACT-North)
Abstract
Background: Clinicians, health care organizations, and families demand better and more accessible children's mental health services with greater patient engagement. The I-InTERACT-North program was developed for children following traumatic brain injury and adapted for a transdiagnostic neurological and neurodevelopmental focus, with a recent transition to a stepped-care model. To date, the program has been exclusively provided within research studies; however, demand for its clinical use is growing. Implementation frameworks provide essential guidance regarding facilitators and barriers of clinical implementation under real-world conditions. Similarly, intersectionality evaluation can provide insights to develop equitable and inclusive health care practices. Informed by the Consolidated Framework of Implementation Research 2.0 (CFIR) and recent intersectionality supplement, the objectives were to examine the perspectives of parents/caregivers and clinical partners involved in the I-InTERACT-North program to identify (a) facilitators and barriers to inform the scale and spread of the program, and (b) equity, diversity, and inclusion (EDI) considerations to integrate in future clinical implementation.
Method: This study used a qualitative descriptive design with focus group methodology. Participants included parents/caregivers and clinical partners. Semi-structured focus groups were conducted virtually. Focus group data were coded inductively and deductively using CFIR 2.0. The team reflected on intersectionality in the data, coding results, and broader context of the program's history.
Results: Positive perceptions of the innovation's relevance and adaptability were echoed across focus groups. Prominent facilitators included the program's adaptability, personalized, flexible format, and knowledge dissemination. Barriers included geography, technological accessibility, and workflow, with participants stressing the importance of tailoring to culture, language, and neurodiversity. Feedback from participants aligned with 10 reflective prompts highlighted within the CFIR intersectionality supplement pertaining to families' intersecting categories, diverse intervention experiences, and information access.
Conclusions: Identified facilitators of I-InTERACT-North implementation extended across program knowledge sharing and recruitment. Recommendations included directions for clinical and system integration to facilitate scalability.
Keywords: behavioral health; children/child and adolescent/youth/family; co-creation; mental health intervention; participatory design.
Plain language summary
Transitioning a stepped-care mental health parenting program (I-InTERACT-North) from research to clinical care: Recommendations from families and clinicians Plain Language Summary I-InTERACT-North is a virtual positive parenting support program designed for neurodiverse children (i.e., Brain Injury, Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD), Autism (ASD)). Participation in this program improves parent-child relationships, child behavior, and parent stress. To enhance feasibility and better meet families’ needs during the pandemic, our team adapted to a stepped-care approach. Stepped-care offers effective treatment tailored in intensity and level of therapist involvement to family needs. Using focus groups of parents and clinical partners, the current study identified facilitators and barriers to inform optimal clinical implementation and expansion of the program beyond our institution. Suggestions included strategies to inform more families about the program, build connections with community agencies, and ways to promote patient diversity and inclusivity. Recommendations also pertained to fitting and funding the program. Results overall highlighted the benefit of ongoing work with families to design and inform the program's clinical implementation.
© The Author(s) 2025.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
References
-
- Antwi-Boasiako K., Fallon B., King B., Trocme N., Fluke J. (2022). Understanding the overrepresentation of black children in Ontario's child welfare system: Perspectives from child welfare workers and community service providers. Child Abuse & Neglect, 123, 105425. 10.1016/j.chiabu.2021.105425 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Barwick M., Barac R., Kimber M., Akrong L., Johnson S. N., Cunningham C. E., Bennett K., Ashbourne G., Godden T. (2020). Advancing implementation frameworks with a mixed methods case study in child behavioral health. Translational Behavioral Medicine, 10(3), 685–704. 10.1093/tbm/ibz005 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources