Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Jun 23.
doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000006812. Online ahead of print.

Robot-assisted and Laparoscopic Extended Left Pancreatectomy: A Pan-European Multicenter Propensity-score Matched Analysis

Collaborators, Affiliations

Robot-assisted and Laparoscopic Extended Left Pancreatectomy: A Pan-European Multicenter Propensity-score Matched Analysis

Caro L Bruna et al. Ann Surg. .

Abstract

Objective: To compare postoperative outcomes after extended robot-assisted left pancreatectomy (e-RLP) and extended laparoscopic left pancreatectomy (e-LLP).

Summary background data: The implementation of RLP is increasing worldwide with expanding indications, resulting in more extended resections. However, the use of e-RLP has not been investigated before.

Methods: International study including consecutive patients after e-RLP and e-LLP for all indications in 19 European countries (2012-2022). Extended resection was defined according to the ISGPS definition. Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed in a 1:1 ratio with a caliper width of 0.1. Primary endpoint was major morbidity (Clavien-Dindo grade ≥III complications).

Results: Overall, 514 patients were included from 72 centers (152 e-RLPs; 362 e-LLPs). Before PSM, e-RLP patients had more tail tumors (69.4% vs 50.0%, P=0.001), vascular involvement (30.3% vs 16.3%, P<0.001) and >2 additional organ resections (28.5% vs 10.7%, P<0.001), with comparable major morbidity rates (27.0% vs 27.0%, P=0.991) and a lower conversion rate (15.1% vs 23.5%, P=0.033), compared to e-LLP. After PSM, 119 e-RLP patients were matched to 119 e-LLP patients. No significant differences were observed in major morbidity (23.5% vs 26.5%, P=0.599), blood loss (200 vs 150 mL, P=0.835), conversion rate (16.0% vs 20.0%, P=0.422), 30-day/in-hospital mortality (1.7% vs 3.4%, P=0.408), and hospital stay (median 7 vs 7 days, P=0.906). E-RLP had longer operative times (median 277 vs 228 min, P<0.001).

Conclusions: This pan-European cohort study found no significant differences in the outcomes among matched patients undergoing e-RLP and e-LLP, although e-RLP was associated with a longer operative time. The robot-assisted approach is used for more extensive resections with a comparable major morbidity rate compared to laparoscopy.

Keywords: distal pancreatectomy; extended resections; left pancreatectomy; minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy; minimally invasive surgery; postoperative pancreatic fistula.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of interests: There are no conflict of interests.

LinkOut - more resources