Health and well-being comparison between residents of serviced housing for older people and community-dwelling older adults in japan: a propensity score matching analysis
- PMID: 40548972
- DOI: 10.1007/s00127-025-02947-8
Health and well-being comparison between residents of serviced housing for older people and community-dwelling older adults in japan: a propensity score matching analysis
Abstract
Purpose: Serviced Housing for Older People (SHOP) in Japan offers barrier-free living environments and supportive services to enhance the health and well-being of older adults. This study aimed to compare the health and well-being of SHOP residents with community-dwelling older adults and to compare factors that may influence them.
Methods: This cross-sectional study utilized propensity score matching to compare the health and well-being of 1,080 SHOP residents (69.4% female; mean age: 83.9 years) with 7,560 community-dwelling older adults (67.8% female; mean age: 84.1 years) from the Japan Gerontological Evaluation Study. Health and well-being were assessed using nine items. Additionally, social behaviours and social factors such as laughing frequency, regular outings, hobbies, depression, participation in preventive care activities, meeting friends frequently, emotional support, and eating with others, were compared.
Results: SHOP residents exhibited significantly higher levels of happiness, life satisfaction, and physical health compared to community-dwelling older adults. They were more engaged in activities like regular outings, attending preventive care activities, meeting friends, and eating with others. They also reported higher frequencies of laughter and received emotional support.
Conclusion: SHOP may improve the health and well-being of older adults. These findings can help in developing age-friendly housing initiatives to address the challenges of an aging society.
Keywords: Human flourishing; Mental health; Physical health; Social interaction; Social participation.
© 2025. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
Declarations. Competing interests: Co-author Katsunori Kondo has received research funding from Sekisui House Real Estate Tokyo, Ltd. The purpose of this funding was to evaluate the effectiveness of the services provided by these companies and to provide them with feedback on how to improve their services based on the findings of this study. The funding contract had no restrictions on the study design, analysis, interpretation, and writing of the article but required a prior agreement for publication. No other authors have conflicts of interest to declare. This study used data from the Japan Gerontological Evaluation Study (JAGES) and Sekisui House Real Estate Tokyo, Ltd. We thank the study participants and the research assistants who collected and managed the data. Ethics approval: This study was conducted with the approval of the Chiba University Ethics Review Committee (No. M10460 & No. M10166). Written informed consent for academic use of the data was obtained from all participants, and only data from individuals who provided consent were included in the analysis.
Similar articles
-
How lived experiences of illness trajectories, burdens of treatment, and social inequalities shape service user and caregiver participation in health and social care: a theory-informed qualitative evidence synthesis.Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 Jun;13(24):1-120. doi: 10.3310/HGTQ8159. Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025. PMID: 40548558
-
Home treatment for mental health problems: a systematic review.Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(15):1-139. doi: 10.3310/hta5150. Health Technol Assess. 2001. PMID: 11532236
-
Engaging Community-Dwelling Older Adults in Research: Qualitative Substudy of Factors Impacting Participation.JMIR Form Res. 2025 Jun 3;9:e74191. doi: 10.2196/74191. JMIR Form Res. 2025. PMID: 40461005 Free PMC article.
-
Community-based complex interventions to sustain independence in older people, stratified by frailty: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.Health Technol Assess. 2024 Aug;28(48):1-194. doi: 10.3310/HNRP2514. Health Technol Assess. 2024. PMID: 39252602 Free PMC article.
-
Physical environmental designs in residential care to improve quality of life of older people.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Mar 7;3(3):CD012892. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012892.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022. PMID: 35253911 Free PMC article.
References
-
- United Nations (2023) World Population Prospects 2019: Highlights. https://population.un.org/wpp/assets/Files/WPP2019_Highlights.pdf . Accessed 27 Feb 2025
-
- World Health Organization (2023) National programmes for age-friendly cities and communities: a guide. https://iris.who.int/bitstream/handle/10665/366634/9789240068698-eng.pdf... . Accessed 27 Feb 2025
-
- Ewen HH, Chahal J (2013) Influence of late life stressors on the decisions of older women to relocate into congregate senior housing. J Hous Elder 27(4):392–408. https://doi.org/10.1080/02763893.2013.813428
-
- Liu Y, Dijst M, Faber J et al (2017) Healthy urban living: residential environment and health of older adults in Shanghai. Health Place 47:80–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthplace.2017.07.007
-
- Wahl H-W, Mollenkopf H, Oswald F, Claus C (2007) Environmental aspects of quality of life in old age. Conceptual and Empirical Issues. In: Mollenkopf H, Walker A (eds) Quality of life in old age. Social Indicators Research Series, vol 31. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 101–122. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-5682-6_7
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources