Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Sep;154(9):2569-2598.
doi: 10.1037/xge0001788. Epub 2025 Jun 23.

Fundamental dimensions of real-time word recognition in challenging listening conditions exhibit within-subject stability and link to outcomes

Affiliations

Fundamental dimensions of real-time word recognition in challenging listening conditions exhibit within-subject stability and link to outcomes

John B Muegge et al. J Exp Psychol Gen. 2025 Sep.

Abstract

Listeners of all ages and hearing abilities must contend with the fact that speech is often heard in challenging conditions. Research has found that the process of spoken word recognition changes in these contexts, but what these changes represent and whether they have meaningful effects on outcomes is unknown. Here, we build on recent work by applying a principal component analysis approach to eye-tracking data to show that these changes reflect a set of underlying dimensions that are shared across two types of challenging listening (noise and vocoding). Moreover, we show that individual listener's use of each dimension is largely consistent across challenge types and is predicted by domain-general factors. Finally, we show that changes to word recognition offer indirect benefits to performance in challenging conditions, but only for some listeners. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

  • Decoupling speech processing from time.
    Muegge JB, Kim H, McMurray B. Muegge JB, et al. Trends Cogn Sci. 2025 Jun 25:S1364-6613(25)00144-5. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2025.05.017. Online ahead of print. Trends Cogn Sci. 2025. PMID: 40571492 Review.

References

    1. Allopenna P, Magnuson JS, & Tanenhaus MK (1998). Tracking the time course of spoken word recognition using eye-movements: evidence for continuous mapping models. Journal of Memory and Language, 38(4), 419–439. https://doi.org/ 10.1006/jmla.1997.2558 - DOI
    1. Apfelbaum KS, Klein-Packard J, & McMurray B (2021). The pictures who shall not be named: Empirical support for benefits of preview in the Visual World Paradigm. Journal of Memory and Language, 121, 104279. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Banai K, & Lavie L (2020). Rapid perceptual learning and individual differences in speech perception: The good, the bad, and the sad. Auditory Perception & Cognition, 3(4), 201–211.
    1. Bates D, Mächler M, Bolker B, & Walker S (2015). Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67(1), 1–48. 10.18637/jss.v067.i01 - DOI
    1. Bent T, Buchwald A, & Pisoni DB (2009). Perceptual adaptation and intelligibility of multiple talkers for two types of degraded speech. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 126(5), 2660–2669. 10.1121/1.3212930 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources