Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Jul 10;68(13):14054-14071.
doi: 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.5c01253. Epub 2025 Jun 23.

New Generation Modified Azole Antifungals against Multidrug-Resistant Candida auris

Affiliations

New Generation Modified Azole Antifungals against Multidrug-Resistant Candida auris

Yiyuan Chen et al. J Med Chem. .

Abstract

The rise of antifungal resistance and limited treatment options highlight the urgent need for new drug classes. Candida auris is a serious global health threat with few effective therapies. In this study, novel azole-based compounds were developed by modifying the azole core with cyclic heteroaliphatic linkers connecting aromatic and heteroaromatic rings. Several compounds showed potent activity against C. auris, including azole-resistant strains, with MICs ranging from 0.016 to 4 μg/mL. The compounds also demonstrated strong activity against C. albicans, Nakaseomyces glabratus, C. tropicalis, and C. parapsilosis, with MICs mostly below 1 μg/mL. Compounds 7, 18, and 21 were more potent than fluconazole. Compound 7 inhibited CYP51, eradicated C. auris biofilms, and showed better intracellular accumulation than fluconazole. In vivo studies in Galleria mellonella and Drosophila melanogaster confirmed efficacy at 5 mg/kg and no toxicity up to 50 mg/kg, supporting further development of this scaffold against multidrug-resistant C. auris infections.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

1
1
Chemical structures of fluconazole and modified azole compounds. (A) General structure of the modified azole compounds. (B) Compounds of library A containing a piperidine linker and different aromatic or heteroaromatic rings.
1
1. General Synthetic Routes for Library A where Different Aromatic/Heteroaromatic Fragments (A) were Connected to the Fluconazole Core via a Piperidine Linker (B). Conditions: (i) NaBH­(OAc)­3, AcOH, DCM/MeOH, Overnight; (ii) DIPEA, MeCN, DMA, 160–180 °C, 2–3 h or TEA, Ethylene Glycol, 200 °C, 15 min; (iii) rac-BINAP, Pd2­(dba)­3, KOtBu, Toluene, 100 °C, Overnight; (iv) 4 M HCl in 4-Dioxane, r.t., 1–2 h; (v) NaOH (aq.), Toluene, 80 °C, Microwave 50 min; (vi) TEA, EtOH, 80 °C, Overnight
2
2. General Synthetic Routes for Library B, where the Terminal Heteroaromatic Fragment of 7 was Connected to the Fluconazole Core via Different Linkers
2
2
Differences in 2D binding interactions observed for fluconazole (A) and compound 7 (B) with a lanosterol 14α-demethylase (LDM) enzyme in (PDB ID 5TZ1 was used as a template for homology modeling).
3
3
Intracellular accumulation of azole antifungals in strain TDG1912. Compound 7 showed significantly greater accumulation than fluconazole (p = < 0.0001).
4
4
Eradication of preformed TDG1912 biofilms by antifungal agents. Established biofilms were treated with serial dilutions of fluconazole (Fluc), voriconazole (Vori), amphotericin B (Amp B), or Compound 7 for 24 h. Residual biofilm biomass was quantified and normalized to the untreated control (% biomass). Data represent the mean ± SD of three independent experiments.
5
5
Time-kill analysis of compound 7, alongside two commercial reference antifungal drugs, fluconazole (Fluc) and voriconazole (Vori) against TDG1912. The limit of detection (LoD) is 1000 CFU/mL. MIC50 results are given in μg/mL. NT represents no treatment.
6
6
Efficacy of modified fluconazole compound 7 and fluconazole (Fluc) against TDG1912 infection in the G. mellonella model.
7
7
Efficacy of compound 7 and fluconazole (Fluc) against TDG1912 infection in the model at an infection dose of 2 × 103 yeast cells per fly.

References

    1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases (NCEZID), Division of Foodborne, Waterborne, and Environmental Diseases (DFWED); U.S. Department of Health & Human Services, https://www.cdc.gov/fungal/antimicrobial-resistant-fungi/. (Accessed 02 June 2025).
    1. Perlin D. S., Rautemaa-Richardson R., Alastruey-Izquierdo A.. The global problem of antifungal resistance: prevalence, mechanisms, and management. Lancet Infect. Dis. 2017;17(12):e383–e392. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(17)30316-X. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Pappas P. G., Rex J. H., Sobel J. D., Filler S. G., Dismukes W. E., Walsh T. J., Edwards J. E.. Infectious Diseases Society of, A. Guidelines for treatment of candidiasis. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2004;38(2):161–189. doi: 10.1086/380796. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Jenks J. D., Hoenigl M.. Treatment of Aspergillosis. J. Fungi. 2018;4(3):98. doi: 10.3390/jof4030098. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Spadari C. C., Wirth F., Lopes L. B., Ishida K.. New Approaches for Cryptococcosis Treatment. Microorganisms. 2020;8(4):631. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms8040613. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources