Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Jun 23.
doi: 10.1007/s13304-025-02288-w. Online ahead of print.

The ACTIVE study: surgical outcomes for minimally invasive and open approach to incisional ventral hernias in a non-elective setting

Lorenzo Crepaz  1 , Alberto Sartori  2 , Stefano Olmi  3 , Mauro Podda  4 , Alberto Di Leo  5 , Cesare Stabilini  6 , Michele Carlucci  7 , Monica Ortenzi  8 ; ACTIVE study group
Collaborators, Affiliations

The ACTIVE study: surgical outcomes for minimally invasive and open approach to incisional ventral hernias in a non-elective setting

Lorenzo Crepaz et al. Updates Surg. .

Abstract

Background: Surgical repair of incisional ventral hernias (VH) is a standard procedure globally, with an increasing role in minimally invasive techniques. This study aims to evaluate postoperative outcomes in emergency repairs for VH, comparing surgical features of open and laparoscopic approaches.

Methods: A retrospective multicentric study (ACTIVE study) was created to evaluate the surgical outcome of VH repair in emergency settings. Data were collected from demographic, preoperative, intra-operative, and postoperative variables, focusing on 30-day morbidity and other short- and long-term outcomes.

Results: Data from 556 patients who underwent emergency VH repair were collected and analyzed, with 175 patients treated with a Minimally Invasive (MIS) approach (31.5%) and 381 (68.5%) receiving open repair. The defect size was larger in the open group (p < 0.001), and operative time was shorter in the MIS group (p = 0.002). Prosthetic repair was more frequently chosen in the MIS group (p < 0.001), with a shorter length of stay (p = 0.013). Postoperative complications and Intensive Care Unit admissions were higher in the open group. The MIS had shorter operative times, smaller defect sizes, and higher mesh usage, even with concurrent bowel resection.

Conclusions: This study confirmed the feasibility and safety of the laparoscopic approach to VH in emergency settings. Despite the lack of solid evidence for routine adoption in emergency settings, the MIS approach demonstrated a lower overall complication rate, shorter hospital stays, and reduced mortality. The laparoscopic approach is a safe and valid tool for tailored surgery, even in emergent settings in selected patients.

Keywords: Emergency; Hernia repair; Laparoscopy; Mesh; Multicentric; Ventral hernia.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declarations. Conflict of interest: Lorenzo Crepaz, Alberto Sartori, Stefano Olmi, Mauro Podda, Alberto Di Leo, Cesare Stabilini, Michele Carlucci, and Monica Ortenzi declare that they have no conflict of interest. Ethics approval: This study was performed in line with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. Approval was granted by the Ethics Committee of San Camillo Hospital, Trento (Date 24/08/2022, No. 2022/0006983/P/IFSC). Informed consent: Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study, in compliance with the requirements of the local Ethical Committees.

Similar articles

See all similar articles

References

    1. Bikhchandani J, Fitzgibbons RJ Jr (2013) Repair of giant ventral hernias. Adv Surg 47:1–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yasu.2013.02.008 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Botteri E, Ortenzi M, Williams S, Balla A, Podda M, Guerrieri M, Sartori A (2023) Nationwide analysis of inpatient laparoscopic ventral hernia repair in Italy from 2015 to 2020. Updates Surg. 75(6):1661–1670. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13304-023-01460-4 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
    1. Köckerling F, Hoffmann H, Mayer F et al (2021) What are the trends in incisional hernia repair? Real-world data over 10 years from the Herniamed registry. Hernia 25(2):255–265. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-020-02319-y - DOI - PubMed
    1. Stabilini C, Cavallaro G, Dolce P, Capoccia Giovannini S, Corcione F, Frascio M, Sodo M, Merola G, Bracale U (2019) Pooled data analysis of primary ventral (PVH) and incisional hernia (VH) repair is no more acceptable: results of a systematic review and metanalysis of current literature. Hernia 23(5):831–845. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-019-02033-4 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Stirler VM, Schoenmaeckers EJ, de Haas RJ, Raymakers JT, Rakic S (2014) Laparoscopic repair of primary and incisional ventral hernias: the differences must be acknowledged: a prospective cohort analysis of 1,088 consecutive patients. Surg Endosc 28(3):891–895. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-013-3243-6 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources