Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Jun 23;8(6):e70959.
doi: 10.1002/hsr2.70959. eCollection 2025 Jun.

Cross-Cultural Paediatric Neuropsychological Assessment: Key Considerations

Freddie O'Donald  1   2 , Clara Calia  2 , Sanne Franzen  3
Affiliations

Cross-Cultural Paediatric Neuropsychological Assessment: Key Considerations

Freddie O'Donald et al. Health Sci Rep. .

Abstract

Background and aims: Cross-cultural paediatric neuropsychology faces important challenges in ensuring assessments are fair and valid across diverse cultural, linguistic, and socioeconomic backgrounds. This article aims to highlight key considerations and gaps in current practice, with a focus on supporting equitable neuropsychological assessment practices in increasingly diverse populations.

Methods: This perspective article draws on a structured narrative review of key literature and explores core themes in the cross-cultural neuropsychological assessment of children, including test adaptation, developmental considerations, and interpreter-mediated assessment.

Results: Three main areas are discussed: (1) the inconsistent adaptation of paediatric-specific cognitive assessment tools across cultures, (2) the influence of cultural and educational factors on child development and test performance, and (3) the complexities of interpreter-mediated neuropsychological assessment in paediatric settings. Although there are established tools and emerging guidance in adult neuropsychology, systematic, child-focused cross-cultural assessment frameworks remain underdeveloped.

Conclusion: Further research is needed to develop culturally responsive, developmentally appropriate, and standardised frameworks for paediatric neuropsychological assessment. This includes improving normative data sets, refining cross-cultural adaptation processes, and developing interpreter protocols tailored to child assessments. These efforts are essential to ensure that assessments are equitable, accurate, and clinically useful across diverse populations.

Keywords: cross‐cultural neuropsychology; cultural adaptation; interpreter‐mediated testing; paediatric neuropsychology.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest. All authors are members of the European Consortium on Cross‐Cultural Neuropsychology (ECCroN), which aims to improve the assessment of culturally, educationally, and linguistically diverse individuals across Europe.

References

    1. Franzen S., Watermeyer T. J., Pomati S., et al., “Cross‐Cultural Neuropsychological Assessment in Europe: Position Statement of the European Consortium on Cross‐Cultural Neuropsychology (ECCroN),” Clinical Neuropsychologist 36, no. 3 (2022): 546–557. - PubMed
    1. Olson K. and Jacobson K., “Cross‐Cultural Considerations in Pediatric Neuropsychology: A Review and Call to Attention,” Applied Neuropsychology: Child 4, no. 3 (2015): 166–177. - PubMed
    1. Van Widenfelt B. M., Treffers P. D. A., De Beurs E., Siebelink B. M., and Koudijs E., “Translation and Cross‐Cultural Adaptation of Assessment Instruments Used in Psychological Research With Children and Families,” Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review 8 (2005): 135–147. - PubMed
    1. Fernández A. L. and Abe J., “Bias in Cross‐Cultural Neuropsychological Testing: Problems and Possible Solutions,” Culture and Brain 6 (2018): 1–35.
    1. McGill R. J., Ward T. J., and Canivez G. L., “Use of Translated and Adapted Versions of the WISC‐V: Caveat Emptor,” School Psychology International 41, no. 3 (2020): 276–294.

LinkOut - more resources