Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2025 Jun 9:16:1598149.
doi: 10.3389/fphys.2025.1598149. eCollection 2025.

Neuromuscular adaptations to resistance training in elite versus recreational athletes

Sumaira Aslam  1 , Jean De Dieu Habyarimana  1 , Shi Yong Bin  1
Affiliations
Review

Neuromuscular adaptations to resistance training in elite versus recreational athletes

Sumaira Aslam et al. Front Physiol. .

Abstract

Neuromuscular adaptations to resistance training drive strength and performance improvements, but differences between elite and recreational athletes remain underexplored. Understanding the underlying mechanisms can refine training approaches and enhance athletic development. This review synthesized findings from the past decade regarding how training status, age, sex, and genetics influence neuromuscular adaptations to resistance training, identified key gaps in the literature, and provided practical recommendations for tailoring training to different athletic levels. This critical review synthesized evidence on neuromuscular adaptations to resistance training, focusing on muscle hypertrophy, architectural changes, motor unit recruitment, neural drive, fiber-type transitions, and genetic influences. Methodological limitations and gaps were highlighted, with a focus on elite versus recreational populations. Muscle hypertrophy and strength gains occur rapidly in novices but plateau in advanced athletes, requiring more complex stimuli. Neural adaptations, including improved motor unit synchronization and reduced antagonist co-contraction, distinguish elite from recreational athletes. Genetic predispositions and training history further modulate adaptations. Fatigue, recovery, and injury risk differ between groups, underscoring the need for tailored monitoring and recovery strategies. Research gaps include inconsistent methodologies, limited elite athlete data, and underrepresentation of female cohorts. Future studies should integrate neurophysiological tools and long-term designs to clarify these mechanisms. Effective training requires adjusting intensity and volume based on an athlete's training status. Foundational strength programs benefit youth, while elite athletes require periodization and advanced methods. Policy-level support for supervised resistance training in youth can enhance performance and injury resilience. Addressing these insights can optimize training outcomes across athletic levels.

Keywords: athletic development; fatigue management; hypertrophy; motor unit recruitment; periodization.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Periodized training programs for elite vs. recreational athletes. Divergent periodization models for elite and recreational athletes. Elite programs emphasize multi-model periodization (strength → power → peaking), while recreational programs focus on linear progression (hypertrophy → strength).
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Muscle fiber type distribution (Elite vs. Recreational athletes).
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3
Fatigue and Recovery Trends in Elite vs. Recreational Athletes.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

References

    1. Aagaard P., Simonsen E. B., Andersen J. L., Magnusson P., Dyhre-Poulsen P. (2002). Increased rate of force development and neural drive of human skeletal muscle following resistance training. J. Appl. physiology 93 (4), 1318–1326. 10.1152/japplphysiol.00283.2002 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Akagi R., Hinks A., Power G. A. (2020). Differential changes in muscle architecture and neuromuscular fatigability induced by isometric resistance training at short and long muscle-tendon unit lengths. J. Appl. Physiology 129 (1), 173–184. 10.1152/japplphysiol.00280.2020 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Akbar S., Soh K. G., Jazaily Mohd Nasiruddin N., Bashir M., Cao S., Soh K. L. (2022). Effects of neuromuscular training on athletes physical fitness in sports: a systematic review. Front. Physiol. 13, 939042. 10.3389/fphys.2022.939042 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Alix-Fages C., Del Vecchio A., Baz-Valle E., Santos-Concejero J., Balsalobre-Fernández C. (2022). The role of the neural stimulus in regulating skeletal muscle hypertrophy. Eur. J. Appl. Physiol. 122 (5), 1111–1128. 10.1007/s00421-022-04906-6 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Andersson H. M., Raastad T., Nilsson J., Paulsen G., Garthe I., Kadi F. (2008). Neuromuscular fatigue and recovery in elite female soccer: effects of active recovery. Med. and Sci. Sports and Exerc. 40 (2), 372–380. 10.1249/mss.0b013e31815b8497 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources