Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Jun 24:13872877251351329.
doi: 10.1177/13872877251351329. Online ahead of print.

Associations of semaglutide with Alzheimer's disease-related dementias in patients with type 2 diabetes: A real-world target trial emulation study

Affiliations

Associations of semaglutide with Alzheimer's disease-related dementias in patients with type 2 diabetes: A real-world target trial emulation study

William Wang et al. J Alzheimers Dis. .

Abstract

BackgroundAlmost half of the dementia cases are preventable. Semaglutide treats several medical conditions that are risk factors for dementia.ObjectiveWe aim to investigate if semaglutide is associated with a decreased risk of dementia.MethodsWe conducted emulation target trials based on a nationwide population-based database of patient electronic health records (EHRs) in the US among 1,710,995 eligible patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) comparing semaglutide with other antidiabetic medications. First-time diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease-related dementia (ADRD) including vascular dementia, frontotemporal dementia, Lewy body dementia and other dementias were examined using Cox proportional hazards and Kaplan-Meier survival analyses during a 3-year follow-up. Models were adjusted by propensity-score matching.ResultsWe show that semaglutide was associated with a significantly reduced risk of overall ADRD incidence with a hazard ratio ranging from 0.54 (0.49-0.59) compared with insulin, 0.67 (0.61-0.74) compared with metformin, to 0.80 (0.72-0.89) compared with older generation glucagon-like peptide-1 agonists (GLP-1RAs). The association varied for specific dementia types, with significantly reduced risk of vascular dementia and no evidence of associations with frontotemporal and Lewy body dementias.ConclusionsThese findings provide evidence supporting protective effects of semaglutide on dementias in patients with T2D. Future works are needed to establish the causal relationships through randomized clinical trials and to characterize the underlying mechanisms.

Keywords: Alzheimer's disease related dementias; Alzheimer’s disease; Lewy body dementia; dementia; frontotemporal dementia; semaglutide; target trial emulation; type 2 diabetes; vascular dementia.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of conflicting interests

The authors declared the following potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: George Perry is an Editor-in-Chief of this journal but was not involved in the peer-review process of this article nor had access to any information regarding its peer-review. The remaining authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Study flow diagram. DPP-4i: dipeptidyl-peptidase-4 inhibitor; GLP-1RA: glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist; SGLT2i: sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitor; SU: sulfonylurea; T2D: type 2 diabetes mellitus; TZD: thiazolidinedione. *The combined total of patients (n = 1,646,728) in the comparison arm is not a sum of the patients from each of the 7 comparison antidiabetic medication groups because a patient could be prescribed more than one antidiabetic medication during the study period, though there was no overlap between semaglutide and each of the comparison medication groups. Other GLP-1RAs included albiglutide (1.2%), dulaglutide (85.1%), exenatide (18.0%), liraglutide (57.0%), and lixisenatide (2.4%).
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Comparison of overall ADRD incidences between matched semaglutide versus other antidiabetic medication groups in patients with T2D who had no prior AD/ADRD during a 3-year follow-up. The exposure and comparison groups were propensity-score matched for variables listed in Table 1, and the status of variables was based on the presence of related clinical codes anytime up to 1 day before the index event (first prescription of semaglutide vs comparison medication classes during 12/2017–12/2021). Individuals in the matched groups were followed starting 30 days after the index event until the occurrence of the outcome, death, loss to follow-up, or 3 years after the index event, whichever occurred first. Hazard rates were calculated using a Cox proportional hazards model with censoring applied. Overall risk=the number of patients with outcomes during the follow-up time window/number of patients in the cohort at the beginning of the time window.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Cumulative ADRD incidences for comparing matched semaglutide with insulin, metformin and other GLP-1RAs groups, respectively, in patients with T2D who had no prior AD/ADRD for a 3-year follow-up.
Figure 4.
Figure 4.
Comparison of incidence of vascular dementia, FTD, LBD and other dementias during the 3-year follow-up between matched semaglutide versus other antidiabetic medication groups in patients with T2D who had no prior diagnosis of AD/ADRD.
Figure 5.
Figure 5.
Comparison of dementia-related medication prescriptions during the 3-year follow-up between matched semaglutide and other antidiabetic medication groups in patients with T2D who had no prior diagnosis of AD/ADRD.
Figure 6.
Figure 6.
Comparison of outpatient visits during the 3-year follow-up between propensity-score matched semaglutide and other antidiabetic medication groups in patients with T2D who had no prior diagnosis of AD/ADRD.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Rajan KB, Weuve J, Barnes LL, et al. Population estimate of people with clinical Alzheimer’s disease and mild cognitive impairment in the United States (2020-2060). Alzheimers Dement 2021; 17: 1966–1975. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Murphy S, Kochanek K, Xu J, et al. Mortality in the United States, 2016. NCHS Data Brief 2017; 293: 1–8. - PubMed
    1. Nandi A, Counts N, Chen S, et al. Global and regional projections of the economic burden of Alzheimer’s disease and related dementias from 2019 to 2050: a value of statistical life approach. EClinicalMedicine 2022; 51: 101580. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Livingston G, Huntley J, Liu KY, et al. Dementia prevention, intervention, and care: 2024 report of the Lancet standing Commission. Lancet 2024; 404: 572–628. - PubMed
    1. Engelhart MJ, Geerlings MI, Meijer J, et al. Inflammatory proteins in plasma and the risk of dementia: the Rotterdam Study. Arch Neurol 2004; 61: 668–672. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources