Setting Australian research priorities for child mental health clinical trials: A Delphi study
- PMID: 40552908
- PMCID: PMC12280242
- DOI: 10.1177/00048674251345318
Setting Australian research priorities for child mental health clinical trials: A Delphi study
Abstract
Objective: To identify Australian research priorities for clinical trials in child mental health (0-12 years).
Methods: A Delphi consensus study across three rounds was carried out with child mental health professional and lived experience experts. Potential research priorities for rating by the experts were identified from a rapid review; content analysis of government strategies and targeted calls for research; and panellists' suggestions. The highest rated priorities were then reduced to a smaller number of top priorities using a resource allocation exercise.
Results: A total of 391 potential priorities were rated by 66 panellists. Panellists endorsed 75 priorities for trials covering a range of mental health interventions (promotion, prevention, assessment, and treatment), as well as overarching priorities applicable to all types of trials. The final resource allocation exercise refined these further to 12 top research priorities, including two promotion trial priorities, seven prevention and assessment trial priorities, and four treatment trial priorities.
Conclusion: Results will aid the Growing Minds Australia Clinical Trials Network's review, prioritisation, and endorsement of future clinical trials in child mental health. The findings can also be used to inform key stakeholders in child mental health on where clinical trial research efforts have focused in the past and what should be considered a priority in the future.
Keywords: Child; Delphi; clinical trial; mental health; research priorities.
Conflict of interest statement
The author(s) declared the following potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship and/or publication of this article: A.J. and A.M. conduct clinical trials research related to child mental health. E.T. and L.N. declare that there is no conflict of interest.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Home treatment for mental health problems: a systematic review.Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(15):1-139. doi: 10.3310/hta5150. Health Technol Assess. 2001. PMID: 11532236
-
Health professionals' experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature.JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):96-137. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-1843. JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016. PMID: 27532314
-
Behavioral interventions to reduce risk for sexual transmission of HIV among men who have sex with men.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008 Jul 16;(3):CD001230. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001230.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008. PMID: 18646068
-
A New Measure of Quantified Social Health Is Associated With Levels of Discomfort, Capability, and Mental and General Health Among Patients Seeking Musculoskeletal Specialty Care.Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 Apr 1;483(4):647-663. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003394. Epub 2025 Feb 5. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025. PMID: 39915110
-
How to Implement Digital Clinical Consultations in UK Maternity Care: the ARM@DA Realist Review.Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 May;13(22):1-77. doi: 10.3310/WQFV7425. Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025. PMID: 40417997 Review.
References
-
- American Psychiatric Association (2022) Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 5th Edition, Text Rev. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association.
-
- Australian Clinical Trials Alliance (2019) Research Prioritisation Survey Report: Approaches and Attitudes to Clinical Trial Prioritisation in Australian Clinical Trial Networks and Coordinating Centres. Melbourne, VIC, Australia: Australian Clinical Trials Alliance.
-
- Biddle SJ, Asare M. (2011) Physical activity and mental health in children and adolescents: A review of reviews. British Journal of Sports Medicine 45: 886–895. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous