Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Jun 24;59(8):48674251345318.
doi: 10.1177/00048674251345318. Online ahead of print.

Setting Australian research priorities for child mental health clinical trials: A Delphi study

Affiliations

Setting Australian research priorities for child mental health clinical trials: A Delphi study

Ellie Tsiamis et al. Aust N Z J Psychiatry. .

Abstract

Objective: To identify Australian research priorities for clinical trials in child mental health (0-12 years).

Methods: A Delphi consensus study across three rounds was carried out with child mental health professional and lived experience experts. Potential research priorities for rating by the experts were identified from a rapid review; content analysis of government strategies and targeted calls for research; and panellists' suggestions. The highest rated priorities were then reduced to a smaller number of top priorities using a resource allocation exercise.

Results: A total of 391 potential priorities were rated by 66 panellists. Panellists endorsed 75 priorities for trials covering a range of mental health interventions (promotion, prevention, assessment, and treatment), as well as overarching priorities applicable to all types of trials. The final resource allocation exercise refined these further to 12 top research priorities, including two promotion trial priorities, seven prevention and assessment trial priorities, and four treatment trial priorities.

Conclusion: Results will aid the Growing Minds Australia Clinical Trials Network's review, prioritisation, and endorsement of future clinical trials in child mental health. The findings can also be used to inform key stakeholders in child mental health on where clinical trial research efforts have focused in the past and what should be considered a priority in the future.

Keywords: Child; Delphi; clinical trial; mental health; research priorities.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The author(s) declared the following potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship and/or publication of this article: A.J. and A.M. conduct clinical trials research related to child mental health. E.T. and L.N. declare that there is no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Criteria for analysing data for endorsement, re-rating or rejection.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Summary of item ratings and Delphi Rounds 1−3 results.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Summary of what informed participant ratings in the Delphi study.

Similar articles

References

    1. American Psychiatric Association (2022) Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 5th Edition, Text Rev. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association.
    1. Australian Clinical Trials Alliance (2019) Research Prioritisation Survey Report: Approaches and Attitudes to Clinical Trial Prioritisation in Australian Clinical Trial Networks and Coordinating Centres. Melbourne, VIC, Australia: Australian Clinical Trials Alliance.
    1. Banfield MA, Morse AR, Gulliver A, et al. (2018) Mental health research priorities in Australia: A consumer and carer agenda. Health Research Policy and Systems 16: 119. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Biddle SJ, Asare M. (2011) Physical activity and mental health in children and adolescents: A review of reviews. British Journal of Sports Medicine 45: 886–895. - PubMed
    1. Birrell L, Grummitt L, Smout S, et al. (2025) Debate: Where to next for universal school-based mental health interventions? Child Adolescent Mental Health 30: 92–95. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources