Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Aug;34(8):3314-3325.
doi: 10.1007/s00586-025-09071-w. Epub 2025 Jun 24.

Positioning and clinical application of the inflection point of the uncinate process in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF): a retrospective study

Affiliations

Positioning and clinical application of the inflection point of the uncinate process in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF): a retrospective study

Jianfeng Jiang et al. Eur Spine J. 2025 Aug.

Abstract

Objective: We propose a novel intraoperative landmark for decompression during anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF), referred to as the inflection point of the uncinate process (IPUP). Its safety and efficacy were systematically assessed through comprehensive radiographic analyses and clinical investigations during ACDF.

Methods: Computed tomography (CT) scan data from 135 patients were analyzed retrospectively. Eight imaging parameters were evaluated: inflection point of uncinate process (IPUP) distance, medial wall of the transverse foramen (MTF)-IPUP distance, anterior wall of the transverse foramen (ATF)-IPUP distance, posterior wall of the transverse foramen (PTF)-IPUP distance, the intervertebral foraminal decompression line(IFDL)-MTF distance, the intervertebral foraminal decompression (IFD) distance, the intervertebral foraminal decompression (IFD) angle, and the maximum decompression angle. A retrospective analysis was conducted on the radiographic data of 87 patients with cervical spondylosis who underwent ACDF between January 2020 and January 2023. Patients were divided into two groups: the IPUP group and the non-IPUP group. Three postoperative radiographic parameters were evaluated: the decompression width, the effective rate of intervertebral foraminal decompression, and the transverse diameter of the spinal cord at the surgical level.

Results: The IPUP distance gradually increased from C3 to C6. The minimal MTF-IPUP distance and PTF-IPUP distance were observed at C5, while the minimal ATF-IPUP distance occurred at C4. The shortest MTF-IFDL distance was observed at C5, while it exceeded 2 mm across all cervical levels. The IFD distance and IFD angle both decreased from C3 to C6, whereas the maximum decompression angle increased. Postoperatively, the decompression width in the IPUP group exceeded the transverse diameter of the spinal cord in all patients and was significantly greater than that in the non-IPUP group at all levels except C3.

Conclusion: Using the IPUP as an intraoperative decompression landmark during ACDF can safely achieve broader spinal cord and nerve root decompression. Vertical decompression confined within the medial borders of the bilateral IPUPs is generally sufficient in most cases. In patients with foraminal stenosis, additional safe neural decompression can be accomplished either by oblique decompression at an 11° lateral deviation from the IPUP or by extending 3 mm laterally at the base of the intervertebral foramen.

Keywords: ACDF; Foraminal decompression; Imaging study; Inflection point of uncinate process.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declarations. Competing interests: We declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. Ethics Approval: The study has been reviewed and approved by the Ethics Committee of General Hospital of Central Theater Command ([2022]059-01) and was performed in conformity with the Declaration of Helsinki. Consent for publication: Written informed consent for publication was obtained from all participants. Availability of data and materials: The datasets used and analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Similar articles

References

    1. Elsamadicy AA, Sayeed S, Sherman JJZ, Craft S, Reeves BC, Hengartner AC, Ghanekar SD, Sadeghzadeh S, Larry Lo SF, Sciubba DM (2025) Association of Safety-Net hospital status and hospital outcomes following ACDF or PCDF for CSM. J Clin Neurosci 133:111001. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocn.2024.111001 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Zhang T, Guo N, Gao G, Liu H, Li Y, Gao F, Zhang Q, Tao X, Yang W, Wang Y (2022) Comparison of outcomes between Zero-p implant and anterior cervical plate interbody fusion systems for anterior cervical decompression and fusion: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Orthop Surg Res 17:47. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-022-02940-w - DOI - PubMed - PMC
    1. Kotani Y, McNulty PS, Abumi K, Cunningham BW, Kaneda K, McAfee PC (1998) The role of anteromedial foraminotomy and the uncovertebral joints in the stability of the cervical spine. A Biomechanical study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 23:1559–1565. https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-199807150-00011 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Nourbakhsh A, Yang J, McMahan H, Garges K (2017) Transverse process anatomy as a guide to vertebral artery exposure during anterior cervical spine approach: A cadaveric study. Clin Anat 30:492–497. https://doi.org/10.1002/ca.22858 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hartman J (2014) Anatomy and clinical significance of the uncinate process and uncovertebral joint: A comprehensive review. Clin Anat 27:431–440. https://doi.org/10.1002/ca.22317 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources