Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Jun 10:16:1577063.
doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1577063. eCollection 2025.

Combating weight-stigmatization in online spaces: the impacts of body neutral, body positive, and weight-stigmatizing TikTok content on body image and mood

Affiliations

Combating weight-stigmatization in online spaces: the impacts of body neutral, body positive, and weight-stigmatizing TikTok content on body image and mood

Raeanna Kilby et al. Front Psychiatry. .

Abstract

Social media movements centered on body positivity and body neutrality both encourage healthy attitudes toward the physical body; however, these movements are conceptually distinct and may have unique influences on body image. This study examined how brief exposure to different types of body acceptance and weight-stigmatizing content affects body image and mood. Participants consisted of women and gender-diverse individuals (N = 326) who completed an online survey and were randomly assigned to view one of four TikTok video compilations: body neutrality, body positivity, weight-stigmatizing, or travel (control) content. Exposure to body positivity and body neutrality content was associated with improvements in functional appreciation, self-objectification, body dissatisfaction, and negative affect. Moreover, although participants across body-focused conditions reported thinking about their appearance to a similar extent, those in the body-positive and body-neutral groups reported more frequent positive appearance-related thoughts than those in the weight-stigmatizing or control conditions. Importantly, differences emerged between the two body acceptance conditions, such that body neutrality was uniquely effective in reducing self-objectification relative to weight-stigmatizing content, while body positivity significantly enhanced positive affect. Moderation analyses revealed marginal interactions, suggesting that the effect of content on body dissatisfaction varied by gender identity, while positive affect varied by perceived body silhouette. Overall, these findings indicate that body-positive and body-neutral content on TikTok may serve as beneficial alternatives to weight-stigmatizing media, though each approach may yield distinct benefits especially in consideration of individual identity characteristics.

Keywords: TikTok; body neutrality; body positivity; self-objectification, mood, body image; social media; weight-stigma.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Stunkard figure rating scale (Stunkard, Sorensen, & Schulsinger, 1983).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Estimated marginal means for body dissatisfaction. A representation of the interaction between condition and time for body dissatisfaction, such that higher scores indicate higher body dissatisfaction.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Estimated marginal means for functional appreciation. A representation of the interaction between condition and time for functional appreciation, such that higher scores indicate higher functional appreciation.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Estimated marginal means for self-objectification. A representation of the interaction between condition and time for self-objectification, such that higher scores indicate higher self-objectification.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Estimated marginal means for positive affect. A representation of the interaction between condition and time for positive affect, such that higher scores indicate higher positive affect.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Estimated marginal means for negative affect. A representation of the interaction between condition and time for negative affect, such that higher scores indicate higher negative affect.

References

    1. Pew Research Center . Social media fact sheet (2024). Available online at: https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/fact-sheet/social-media/ (Accessed November, 2024).
    1. American Psychiatric Association . One in Three Americans Worry About Social Media’s Impact on Mental Health Nearly Half Say It Has Hurt Society at Large (2022). Available online at: https://www.psychiatry.org/news-room/news-releases/one-in-three-american... (Accessed January 15, 2025).
    1. Valkenburg PM. Social media use and well-being: What we know and what we need to know. Curr Opin Psychol. (2022) 45:101294. doi: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2021.12.006 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Fardouly J, Vartanian LR. Social media and body image concerns: Current research and future directions. Curr Opin Psychol. (2016) 9:1–5. doi: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2015.09.005 - DOI
    1. Holland G, Tiggemann M. A systematic review of the impact of the use of social networking sites on body image and disordered eating outcomes. Body Image. (2016) 17:100–10. doi: 10.1016/j.bodyim.2016.02.008 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources