Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Apr 1;38(4):514-522.
doi: 10.1080/08998280.2025.2480512. eCollection 2025.

Evaluating the efficacy and safety of survodutide for obesity: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Affiliations

Evaluating the efficacy and safety of survodutide for obesity: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Abdelaziz A Awad et al. Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent). .

Abstract

Background: Glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) agonists have established their efficacy and safety in the treatment of obesity. In this study, we aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of survodutide, a new GLP-1 agonist.

Methods: We searched PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and Cochrane Library databases until May 2024 for randomized controlled trials using survodutide obesity treatment. Continuous data were pooled as standardized mean difference (SMD), while dichotomous data were pooled as risk ratios (RR) with 95% confidence intervals.

Results: There was a significant relative body weight reduction in the survodutide group (SMD: -1.5; 95% CI: -2.05 to -0.95; P < 0.00001). Overall adverse events in the four included studies weren't significantly different between the survodutide group and placebo group (RR: 1.18; 95% CI: 0.98 to 1.41; I 2 = 72%; P = 0.08). Survodutide was associated with a higher risk of developing diarrhea than the placebo group in the four included trials (RR: 1.89; 95% CI: 1.2 to 2.97; I 2=0%; P < 0.00001).

Conclusion: Survodutide effectively reduced relative body weight, absolute body weight, and hemoglobin A1c (P < 0.00001). The incidence of adverse events was comparable between the two groups, while gastrointestinal adverse events were higher in the survodutide group.

Keywords: Meta-analysis; obesity; review; survodutide.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors report no funding or conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
PRISMA chart of the reported studies showing the search selection strategy and exclusion criteria.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
A forest plot showing the relative change in body weight from baseline (%).
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
A forest plot showing the absolute change from baseline in body weight (kg).
Figure 4.
Figure 4.
A forest plot for all adverse events.

Similar articles

References

    1. Patient well-being and the clinical and economic burdens associated with obesity in the United States. Am J Managed Care. 2022;28(Suppl 15):S279–S287. - PubMed
    1. Koliaki C, Dalamaga M, Liatis S.. Update on the obesity epidemic: after the sudden rise, is the upward trajectory beginning to flatten? Curr Obes Rep. 2023;12(4):514–527. doi: 10.1007/s13679-023-00527-y. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. World Health Organization . Preventing and Managing the Global Epidemic of Obesity. Geneva: World Health Organization; 1997. - PubMed
    1. Sanghera DK, Bejar C, Sharma S, Gupta R, Blackett PR.. Obesity genetics and cardiometabolic health: potential for risk prediction. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2019;21(5):1088–1100. doi: 10.1111/dom.13641. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Verde L, Frias-Toral E, Cardenas D.. Editorial: environmental factors implicated in obesity. Front Nutr. 2023;10:1171507. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2023.1171507. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources