Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Jul 1;131(13):e35868.
doi: 10.1002/cncr.35868.

Consensus guideline for the management of peritoneal mesothelioma

Collaborators, Affiliations

Consensus guideline for the management of peritoneal mesothelioma

Leanne M Brown et al. Cancer. .

Abstract

The treatment of peritoneal mesothelioma (PeM) poses significant challenges because of its rare incidence, heterogeneity, and limited clinical evidence. This commentary describes results from a national consensus aimed at addressing the management of PeM. An update of the 2018 Chicago consensus guidelines was conducted with a modified Delphi technique, which encompassed two rounds of voting. The levels of agreement for various pathway blocks were assessed. Of 101 participants responding in the first round of modified Delphi voting, 95 (94%) responded in the second round. Over 90% consensus was achieved in five of six and six of six pathway blocks in rounds 1 and 2, respectively. Observation was recommended for benign neoplasms, with guidance for interventions in the presence of symptoms or concerning clinicopathological features. For malignant pathology, management was outlined on the basis of a multidisciplinary assessment of patient characteristics, disease histology, and predictive success of medical and surgical interventions. Additional emphasis was placed on multimodal therapy for intermediate-risk and appropriate high-risk patients. A rapid review demonstrated the limited availability of data and inconclusive findings regarding optimal systemic therapy timing. There was unanimous support for considering clinical trial enrollment. Given the limited evidence, the consensus-driven pathway provides essential guidance regarding the management of PeM. To further direct clinical care, additional dedicated research to generate higher quality evidence is needed.

Keywords: cytoreductive surgical procedures; guidelines; mesothelioma; peritoneal surface malignancies; peritoneal surface neoplasms.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

  • Consensus Guideline for the Management of Peritoneal Mesothelioma.
    Brown LM, Wilkins SG, Bansal VV, Su DG, Gomez-Mayorga J, Turaga KK, Gunderson CG, Lee B, Nash GM, Hays JL, Raghav KP, Husain AL, Kluger MD, Zauderer MG, Kindler HL, Alexander HR; Peritoneal Surface Malignancies (PSM) Consortium Group. Brown LM, et al. Ann Surg Oncol. 2025 Jun 25. doi: 10.1245/s10434-025-17358-x. Online ahead of print. Ann Surg Oncol. 2025. PMID: 40560500 Review.
  • Consensus guideline for the management of peritoneal metastases from neuroendocrine neoplasms.
    Su DG, Brown LM, Bansal VV, Bakkila B, Concors SJ, Turaga KK, Gunderson C, Bergsland E, Strosberg JR, Halfdanarson TR, Metz DC, Kunstman JW, Kunz PL, Gangi A; Peritoneal Surface Malignancies Consortium Group. Su DG, et al. Cancer. 2025 Jul 1;131(13):e35871. doi: 10.1002/cncr.35871. Cancer. 2025. PMID: 40558053
  • Consensus guideline for the management of colorectal cancer with peritoneal metastases.
    Schultz KS, Bansal VV, Wach MM, Bhutiani N, Godley FA 4th, Wang JJ, Waheed MT, Buchheit JT, Papai E, Campbell S, Schleimer LE, Su DG, Turaga KK, Gunderson CG, White MG, Uppal A, Raghav KPS, Labow DM, Sarpel U, Shergill AP, Shen JP, Eng C, Foote MB, Baumgartner JM; Peritoneal Surface Malignancies Consortium Group. Schultz KS, et al. Cancer. 2025 Jul 1;131(13):e35869. doi: 10.1002/cncr.35869. Cancer. 2025. PMID: 40558054
  • Consensus guideline for the management of gastric cancer with synchronous peritoneal metastases.
    Butensky SD, Bansal VV, Su DG, Waheed MT, Nikiforchin A, Gomez-Mayorga JL, Olecki E, Radomski SN, Sun B, Turaga KK, Gunderson CG, Lacy J, Badgwell BD, In H, Kennedy T, Yoon HH, Greer JB, Sundar R, Woo Y; Peritoneal Surface Malignancies Consortium Group. Butensky SD, et al. Cancer. 2025 Jul 1;131(13):e35870. doi: 10.1002/cncr.35870. Cancer. 2025. PMID: 40558029
  • Home treatment for mental health problems: a systematic review.
    Burns T, Knapp M, Catty J, Healey A, Henderson J, Watt H, Wright C. Burns T, et al. Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(15):1-139. doi: 10.3310/hta5150. Health Technol Assess. 2001. PMID: 11532236

References

REFERENCES

    1. Kim J, Bhagwandin S, Labow DM. Malignant peritoneal mesothelioma: a review. Ann Transl Med. 2017;5(11):236. doi:10.21037/atm.2017.03.96
    1. Moolgavkar SH, Meza R, Turim J. Pleural and peritoneal mesotheliomas in SEER: age effects and temporal trends, 1973–2005. Cancer Causes Control. 2009;20(6):935‐944. doi:10.1007/s10552‐009‐9328‐9
    1. Bridda A, Padoan I, Mencarelli R, Frego M. Peritoneal mesothelioma: a review. MedGenMed. 2007;9(2):32.
    1. Magge D, Zenati MS, Austin F, et al. Malignant peritoneal mesothelioma: prognostic factors and oncologic outcome analysis. Ann Surg Oncol. 2014;21(4):1159‐1165. doi:10.1245/s10434‐013‐3358‐y
    1. Yano H, Moran BJ, Cecil TD, Murphy EM. Cytoreductive surgery and intraperitoneal chemotherapy for peritoneal mesothelioma. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2009;35(9):980‐985. doi:10.1016/j.ejso.2008.09.010