Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2025 Jun 17;14(2):49.
doi: 10.3390/antib14020049.

Regulatory T Cell in Kidney Transplant: The Future of Cell Therapy?

Affiliations
Review

Regulatory T Cell in Kidney Transplant: The Future of Cell Therapy?

Ahmad Matarneh et al. Antibodies (Basel). .

Abstract

The long-term use of immunosuppressive drugs following kidney transplantation increases the risk of life-threatening infections, malignancies, and, paradoxically, eventual allograft rejection. Therefore, achieving a balance between over-immunosuppression and under-immunosuppression is critical to optimizing patient outcomes. One promising approach is immune cell-based therapy using suppressor immune cells to modulate the immune response more precisely. Among these, regulatory T cells (Tregs) are the most extensively studied and have shown significant potential in the post-transplant setting. Tregs are broadly categorized into thymus-derived and peripherally derived subsets. Physiologically, they play key roles in maintaining immune tolerance, including in autoimmune diseases and within the tumor microenvironment. Their immunosuppressive functions are mediated through both contact-dependent and contact-independent mechanisms. Studies investigating the use of Tregs following kidney transplantation have shown encouraging results. This review summarizes the biology of Tregs and highlights current evidence supporting their role in transplant immunotherapy.

Keywords: graft versus host disease; immunosuppressive therapy; kidney transplant; regulatory T cells; treg adoptive cell therapy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest relevant to the content of this manuscript.

Figures

Figure 2
Figure 2
Comparison between different cell-based therapies.
Figure 1
Figure 1
Types of Treg cells according to their site of origin and differentiation.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. United States Renal Data System . 2023 USRDS Annual Data Report: Epidemiology of Kidney Disease in the United States. National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases; Bethesda, MD, USA: 2023.
    1. Hansen C.M., Bachmann S., Su M., Budde K., Choi M. Calcineurin Inhibitor Associated Nephrotoxicity in Kidney Transplantation—A Transplant Nephrologist’s Perspective. Acta Physiol. 2025;241:e70047. doi: 10.1111/apha.70047. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Puri P., Bansal N. Renal Dysfunction After Liver Transplant: Is CNI Nephrotoxicity Overrated. J. Clin. Exp. Hepatol. 2023;13:556–558. doi: 10.1016/j.jceh.2023.05.005. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Rubinstein J., Toner K., Gross T., Wistinghausen B. Diagnosis and management of post-transplant lymphoproliferative disease following solid organ transplantation in children, adolescents, and young adults. Best Pract. Res. Clin. Haematol. 2023;36:101446. doi: 10.1016/j.beha.2023.101446. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Tamargo C.L., Kant S. Pathophysiology of rejection in kidney transplantation. J. Clin. Med. 2023;12:4130. doi: 10.3390/jcm12124130. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources