Periprosthetic Joint Infection in Unicompartmental vs. Total Knee Arthroplasty: Microbiological Spectrum and Management Outcomes
- PMID: 40558174
- PMCID: PMC12189609
- DOI: 10.3390/antibiotics14060585
Periprosthetic Joint Infection in Unicompartmental vs. Total Knee Arthroplasty: Microbiological Spectrum and Management Outcomes
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is a severe complication following both total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA). While the microbiological profile of TKA PJI has been well characterized, limited data exist regarding UKA PJIs. This study aimed to compare the causative microorganisms and surgical treatment outcomes in PJI cases following UKA and TKA. Methods: This retrospective cohort study included 82 patients (71 TKA and 11 UKA) who underwent surgical treatment for PJI between January 2017 and May 2024. PJI was diagnosed based on the Musculoskeletal Infection Society (MSIS) criteria. Treatment strategies included debridement, antibiotics, and implant retention (DAIR) or two-stage revision arthroplasty. Microbiological data were extracted from intraoperative cultures. Fisher's exact test and the Mann-Whitney U test were used for statistical comparisons. Results: Gram-positive organisms, primarily Staphylococcus aureus and coagulase-negative staphylococci, were isolated in all UKA PJIs. In contrast, the TKA group demonstrated greater microbial diversity, including Gram-negative bacilli, polymicrobial infections, and a higher rate of culture-negative cases (33.8% vs. 18.2%). DAIR was performed more frequently in UKA cases (72.7% vs. 28.2%, p = 0.002). Recurrence rates following DAIR were similar in both groups (12.5% in UKA, 20.0% in TKA, p = 1.000). Two-stage revision resulted in no recurrence in UKA and a 9.8% recurrence rate in TKA patients. Conclusions: UKA PJIs appear to be microbiologically less complex than TKA PJI cases, with Gram-positive organisms predominating. Despite these differences, the outcomes of surgical treatment-both DAIR and two-stage revision-were comparable between groups. Standard PJI treatment principles may be applicable to both arthroplasty types; however, larger prospective studies are needed to confirm these findings.
Keywords: microbiological spectrum; periprosthetic joint infection; total knee arthroplasty; unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Similar articles
-
Debridement, Antibiotics, and Implant Retention in Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty Infection.J Arthroplasty. 2024 Aug;39(8S1):S285-S289. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2024.03.057. Epub 2024 Mar 26. J Arthroplasty. 2024. PMID: 38548232
-
Better short-term function after unicompartmental compared to total knee arthroplasty.BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2021 Apr 2;22(1):326. doi: 10.1186/s12891-021-04185-w. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2021. PMID: 33810795 Free PMC article.
-
Comparative outcomes of revision total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-Analysis of high tibial osteotomy vs. unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2025 Aug 12;26(1):780. doi: 10.1186/s12891-025-08891-7. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2025. PMID: 40796820 Free PMC article.
-
Disease progression, aseptic loosening and bearing dislocations are the main revision indications after lateral unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a systematic review.J ISAKOS. 2022 Oct;7(5):132-141. doi: 10.1016/j.jisako.2022.06.001. Epub 2022 Jun 28. J ISAKOS. 2022. PMID: 35777698
-
Periprosthetic joint infection in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: treatment options and outcomes. What is the current evidence in literature?Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2023 Feb;143(2):1031-1039. doi: 10.1007/s00402-022-04414-4. Epub 2022 Mar 18. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2023. PMID: 35303146 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Casper D.S., Fleischman A.N., Papas P.V., Grossman J., Scuderi G.R., Lonner J.H. Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty Provides Significantly Greater Improvement in Function than Total Knee Arthroplasty Despite Equivalent Satisfaction for Isolated Medial Compartment Osteoarthritis. J. Arthroplast. 2019;34:1611–1616. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2019.04.005. - DOI - PubMed
-
- Liu L., Li J., Wang Y., Li X., Han P., Li X. Cemented versus cementless Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty for the treatment of medial knee osteoarthritis: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch. Orthop. Trauma Surg. 2024;144:4391–4403. doi: 10.1007/s00402-024-05539-4. - DOI - PubMed
-
- Sutton P.M., Murray J.S. The National Joint Registry 22 years on: What have we learned about knee replacements? Orthop. Trauma. 2025;39:74–80. doi: 10.1016/j.mporth.2024.12.008. - DOI
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources