Prescription patterns in DMEK: European survey
- PMID: 40558573
- PMCID: PMC12582606
- DOI: 10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000001726
Prescription patterns in DMEK: European survey
Abstract
Purpose: To assess current prescription patterns in Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) in Europe.
Setting: Countries affiliated with the European Cornea and Cell Transplantation Registry and the European Vision Institute Clinical Research Network.
Design: Cross-sectional study (European survey).
Methods: An electronic survey was distributed to 16 national societies to gather data on prescription patterns for DMEK. Responses were categorized by 3 clinical goals: prevention of postoperative endophthalmitis, graft rejection, and pupillary block and glaucoma.
Results: Responses from 136 surgeons revealed that medication protocols mainly came from departmental protocols (54%) or personal experiences (48%) rather than national guidelines (22%) (multiple answers were allowed). Infection prevention primarily relied on intraoperative (72%) and postoperative (92%) antibiotics, with preoperative use less common (18%). Steroids were the mainstay for rejection prevention, used intraoperatively (59%), postoperatively (100%), and occasionally preoperatively (13%). Steroids were typically tapered to once daily after 6 months (46%) and discontinued after varying durations (65%). Dexamethasone was the preferred steroid. For high-risk DMEK, the most common approach was adding another topical (30%) or systemic immunosuppressive drug (24%), such as cyclosporine or mycophenolate. For graft rejection, most respondents increased topical steroid frequency (85%) or added (peri)bulbar steroid injections (42%). Pupillary block and glaucoma prophylaxis mainly involved intraoperative mydriatics (34%); intraocular pressure-lowering agents were rarely used (0.7% to 2.2%). For steroid-induced ocular hypertension, the common approach was switching to a lower-potency steroid (40%) or reducing steroid frequency (43%).
Conclusions: Current prescription patterns in routine and high-risk DMEK vary significantly, reflecting the lack of standardized guidelines.
Copyright © 2025 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of ASCRS and ESCRS.
Figures
References
-
- Dunker SL, Veldman MHJ, Winkens B, van den Biggelaar FJHM, Nuijts RMMA, Kruit PJ, Dickman MM; Dutch Cornea Consortium. Real-world outcomes of DMEK: a prospective Dutch registry study. Am J Ophthalmol. 2021;222:218–225 - PubMed
-
- Zorginstituut Nederland. Standpunt Descemet membraan endotheliale keratoplastiek (DMEK). 2022. Accessed April 23, 2024. https://www.zorginstituutnederland.nl/publicaties/standpunten/2022/09/29...
-
- Dutch Ophthalmological Society . Knowledge Agenda 2020-2024. 33; Accessed April 23, 2024. https://www.oogheelkunde.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/12/NOG_Kennisagenda...
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
