Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Jun 2;6(2):28.
doi: 10.3390/ebj6020028.

From Data to Decisions: Leveraging Retrieval-Augmented Generation to Balance Citation Bias in Burn Management Literature

Affiliations

From Data to Decisions: Leveraging Retrieval-Augmented Generation to Balance Citation Bias in Burn Management Literature

Ariana Genovese et al. Eur Burn J. .

Abstract

(1) Burn injuries demand multidisciplinary, evidence-based care, yet the extensive literature complicates timely decision making. Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) synthesizes research while addressing inaccuracies in pretrained models. However, citation bias in sourcing for RAG often prioritizes highly cited studies, overlooking less-cited but valuable research. This study examines RAG's performance in burn management, comparing citation levels to enhance evidence synthesis, reduce selection bias, and guide decisions. (2) Two burn management datasets were assembled: 30 highly cited (mean: 303) and 30 less-cited (mean: 21). The Gemini-1.0-Pro-002 RAG model addressed 30 questions, ranging from foundational principles to advanced surgical approaches. Responses were evaluated for accuracy (5-point scale), readability (Flesch-Kincaid metrics), and response time with Wilcoxon rank sum tests (p < 0.05). (3) RAG achieved comparable accuracy (4.6 vs. 4.2, p = 0.49), readability (Flesch Reading Ease: 42.8 vs. 46.5, p = 0.26; Grade Level: 9.9 vs. 9.5, p = 0.29), and response time (2.8 vs. 2.5 s, p = 0.39) for the highly and less-cited datasets. (4) Less-cited research performed similarly to highly cited sources. This equivalence broadens clinicians' access to novel, diverse insights without sacrificing quality. As plastic surgery evolves, RAG's inclusive approach fosters innovation, improves patient care, and reduces cognitive burden by integrating underutilized studies. Embracing RAG could propel the field toward dynamic, forward-thinking care.

Keywords: AI (artificial intelligence); RAG (retrieval-augmented generation); burn; clinical decision support; large language model; plastic surgery.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Leveraging retrieval-augmented generation (RAG)-based Gemini for burn care management assistance. Created with BioRender [80].
Figure 2
Figure 2
Accuracy of low- and high-citation sources for retrieval-augmented generation using scale of 1–5. Created with Microsoft Excel.

Similar articles

References

    1. American Burn Association Burn Incidence Fact Sheet. 2024. [(accessed on 14 December 2024)]. Available online: https://ameriburn.org/resources/burn-incidence-fact-sheet.
    1. Kao C.C., Garner W.L. Acute Burns. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 2000;105:2482. doi: 10.1097/00006534-200006000-00028. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Johnson C. Management of burns. Surgery. 2018;36:435–440. doi: 10.1016/j.mpsur.2018.05.004. - DOI
    1. Al-Mousawi A.M., Mecott-Rivera G.A., Jeschke M.G., Herndon D.N. Burn Teams and Burn Centers: The Importance of a Comprehensive Team Approach to Burn Care. Clin. Plast. Surg. 2009;36:547. doi: 10.1016/j.cps.2009.05.015. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Munn Z., Kavanagh S., Lockwood C., Pearson A., Wood F. The development of an evidence based resource for burns care. Burns. 2013;39:577–582. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2012.11.005. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources