Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Jun 3;16(6):208.
doi: 10.3390/jfb16060208.

Transparent 3-Layered Bacterial Nanocellulose as a Multicompartment and Biomimetic Scaffold for Co-Culturing Cells

Affiliations

Transparent 3-Layered Bacterial Nanocellulose as a Multicompartment and Biomimetic Scaffold for Co-Culturing Cells

Karla Pollyanna Vieira de Oliveira et al. J Funct Biomater. .

Abstract

Three-dimensional (3D) cell culture models are widely used to provide a more physiologically relevant microenvironment in which to host and study desired cell types. These models vary in complexity and cost, ranging from simple and inexpensive to highly sophisticated and costly systems. In this study, we introduce a novel translucent multi-compartmentalized stacked multilayered nanocellulose scaffold and describe its fabrication, characterization, and potential application for co-culturing multiple cell types. The scaffold consists of bacterial nanocellulose (BNC) layers separated by interlayers of a lower density of nanocellulose fibers. Using this system, we co-cultured the MDA-MB-231 cell line with two tumor-associated cell types, namely BC-CAFs and M2 macrophages, to simulate the tumor microenvironment (TME). Cells remained viable and metabolically active for up to 15 days. Confocal microscopy showed no signs of cell invasion. However, BC-CAFs and MDA-MB-231 cells were frequently observed within the same layer. The expression of breast cancer-related genes was analyzed to assess the downstream functionality of the cells. We found that the E-cadherin expression was 20% lower in cancer cells co-cultured in the multi-compartmentalized scaffold than in those cultured in 2D plates. Since E-cadherin plays a critical role in preventing the initial dissociation of epithelial cells from the primary tumor mass and is often downregulated in the tumor microenvironment in vivo, this finding suggests that our scaffold more effectively recapitulates the complexity of a tumor microenvironment.

Keywords: 3D cell culture model; bacterial nanocellulose; triple-cell co-culture.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

All authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest. EA.hy929 experiments were performed at EMBRAPA, under approval of A.P.A.B. The company has no conflict of interest on this work.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Schematic of 3LBNC scaffold fabrication and triple-cell co-culture. (A) Three-layer structure after 21 days of incubation in DMCM. (B) Cell injection/seeding protocol into each interfacial layer of 3LBNC scaffold for confocal microscopy analysis. A total of 9.4 × 104 BC-CAFs were seeded under the first layer, then 2 × 106 MDA-MB-231 and 9.3 × 104 M2 macrophages were injected into the first and the second interlayer, respectively.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Microstructure and pore size of 3LBNC scaffolds. (A) SEM micrographs of individual layers of 3LBNC compared to the SLBNC control showing a more porous structure for the bottom layer (5000×). (B) Cross-section of 3LBNC showing layers (arrows) and interlayers (*) at 100×, 500×, and 5000× magnification. (C) Feret diameter of the 3LBNC-derived individual layers compared to SLBNC and Pearson’s correlation matrix of individual layers’ surfaces: P: porous; D: dense. n = 1 for SLBNC, and n = 3 for layers. * 0.01 < p < 0.05, *** p < 0.001, and **** p < 0.0001.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Evaluation of cell culturing into layered scaffolds. (A) Diffusion assay in 2LBNC compared to SLBNC. DMEM tested and compared to glucose solution in both scaffolds. (B) Cell proliferation (MTS) assay with MDA-MB-231 in 2LBNC samples and in 2D cell culture plate (2 × 106 cells/scaffold 3D culture and 8 × 104 cells/well 2D culture). One-way ANOVA (p < 0.05) with n = 9. (C) Live/dead assay with EOMA cells after one-week cell culture in the 2LBNC and 3LBNC scaffolds (live cells in green, dead cells in red, merged images in last column, scale bars: 100 µm). (D) DAPI assay of EA.hy926 cultured in second interlayer of 3LBNC scaffolds for up to 15 days. Samples remained inside inserts to avoid lateral cell migration; from left to right: top view of entire scaffold, bottom view of third and second layers. **** p < 0.0001.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Triple-cell co-culture in 3LBNC scaffold. (A) Three-dimensional confocal microscopy of cells seeded/injected into 3LBNC at different time points: MDA-MB-231 in green, BC-CAFs in red, M2 macrophages in blue. (B) CDH1, JUNB, and DUSP5 gene expression relative to GAPDH. The 15-day time point plate-grown cells was not tested. Asterisks refer to statistical significance of cells cultured in the 3LBNC versus cells cultured on the plates (* 0.01 < p < 0.05, ** 0.001 < p < 0.01).

Similar articles

References

    1. Muiznieks L.D., Keeley F.W. Molecular assembly and mechanical properties of the extracellular matrix: A fibrous protein perspective. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 2013;1832:866–875. doi: 10.1016/j.bbadis.2012.11.022. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Karamanos N.K., Theocharis A.D., Piperigkou Z., Manou D., Passi A., Skandalis S.S., Vynios D.H., Orian-Rousseau V., Ricard-Blum S., Schmelzer C.E.H. A guide to the composition and functions of the extracellular matrix. FEBS J. 2021;288:6850–6912. doi: 10.1111/febs.15776. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Frantz C., Stewart K.M., Weaver V.M. The extracellular matrix at a glance. J. Cell Sci. 2010;123:4195–4200. doi: 10.1242/jcs.023820. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Filipe E.C., Chitty J.L., Cox T.R. Charting the unexplored extracellular matrix in cancer. Int. J. Exp. Pathol. 2018;99:58–76. doi: 10.1111/iep.12269. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Armingol E., Officer A., Harismendy O., Lewis N.E. Deciphering cell–cell interactions and communication from gene expression. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2021;22:71–88. doi: 10.1038/s41576-020-00292-x. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources